Creole Classification

1329 Words3 Pages

Open Controversy: Weaknesses in Genetic Classification Theories
According to DeGraf (2014, p. 233), in spite of the volumes of studies on creole, it has not been “operationalized with rigorous and reliable criteria in linguistic theory.” Creole is a sociohistorically as well as politically-motivated construct that is usually misidentified as linguistic (DeGraf 2014; Mufwene, 2008). The word creole itself comes from the Portuguese word “crioulo” as well as the Spanish “criollo” which generally means “raised in the home” (DeGraf 2014, p. 233). The term was first used in the classification of certain animal and plant varieties rather than in languages. In the history of the Caribbean, the term was eventually used for the classification of biological beings, including man. Therefore, the word “Creole” usually precedes the official classifications of different types of species. As seen here, the original use of creole did not have any structural properties, and may be applied as a descriptor of speech varieties rather than species varieties. DeGraf (2014) explains that the original creole speakers were those working in Caribbean plantations (Classic creole) with significant …show more content…

Creole exceptionalism is comprised of several enduring hypotheses regarding Creole languages in which they are regarded as constituting “a sui generis class on phylogenetic and/or structuralgrounds” (De Graf, 2014, p. 233), For instance, it has been hypothesized that creoles are “degenerate offshoots” of their European predecessors (DeGraf, 2014, p. 233). There are also creoles with ‘special hybrids” with distinctive Genealogy (DeGraf, 2014, p. 233). Also, creoles arethe only modern languages that have not evolved in a normal manner relative to other languages simply because they do not have structurallyfull-fledged predecessors. Lastly, the pidgin-to-creole transition “recapitulates the transition from pre-human protolanguage to human language” (DeGraf, 2014, p.

Open Document