Counterargument In Research Paper

756 Words2 Pages

Argument: Below is my argument in standard form: All employees who disrespect their company in any way should be fired by their company. All employees should be held accountable for their actions. Therefore every employee that is held accountable should be fired by their company. Counterargument: Below is my counterargument in standard form: Employers should not be stringent on employees when they are off duty. Employers should not fire employees for social media content. Therefore, employers should not fire employees for any actions off duty. Counterarguments are always very fun in my opinion, you get to pick at a certain piece of information and find all of the false things in that argument. My counterargument consists of two premises and …show more content…

It is also stating that everyone should only be responsible for work things when they are at work, not at any other time. My second premise states “Employers should not fire employees for social media content.” This is stating that no one employee should be fired for anything to do with social media. It is also stating that employees should only be responsible to their work when they are at work only, leaving them free to do whatever they want in their personal time. Overall my premises are stating that any one person should only be held accountable when they are at work, not on their personal …show more content…

This disagreement has many valid points on both sides of the argument. On the argument side, one of the premises states that “All employees should be held accountable for their actions.” I believe most people and employers believe in this premise. On the other hand you have the counterargument premise that states “Employers should not be stringent on employees when they are off duty.” Which I also believe that most employees believe in, and also most people believe too. I think both are very valid points in the

Open Document