Cost Segregation Pros And Cons

1316 Words3 Pages

Cost Segregation is the process of allocating the total cost of a property into the appropriate property classes in order to compute depreciation deductions. When a client purchases or builds a commercial property, as per MACRS, it is depreciated over 39 years. The building has several components, the tax law considers that some of these components will last the full 39 years, however, pieces and parts of the building have a shorter life. While conducting a cost segregation, these components are identified and a fraction of the total cost of the building is allocated to each component. Then depending on its classification, a shorter depreciation schedule is applied.
A cost segregation study does not increase the amount of depreciation taken. It allows for it to be taken sooner, a deduction today is worth more than a deduction after 39 years. It is based to the principle that “a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow”. By accelerating a building’s depreciation, property owners can lower their tax liability, which will result in an increase in cash flow. The AICPA recommends that cost segregation studies should be used whenever expenditures for a certain structure, including leasehold improvements, equal or exceed $750,000.
The basic advantages of a Cost segregation study are:
• An immediate increase in cash flow
• A …show more content…

A disadvantage of the catch-up provision would arise due to subsequent sale. It the property is sold, the basis reduction accompanying the catch-up could result in the taxpayer’s being taxed on the gain at the ordinary tax rates due to the depreciation recapture rules. In regards to a Sec 1060 transaction, the IRS requires an allocation agreement to be binding on both the transferor and the transferee. Hence, for such a transaction, a cost segregation study should be performed before the purchase agreement is

More about Cost Segregation Pros And Cons

Open Document