Cost Of Artifact

528 Words2 Pages

In a museum, the curator is the head of personnel and researches, collects, documents, and displays artifacts. When deciding what artifacts to buy and use, the curator has to keep a balanced list to decide. They must consider the cost in proportion to the market value of the business, the historical and modern relevance of an artifact, and the ethical value of said artifact. The cost of the artifact must be balanced with the market value to benefit the business. “The reoccurring operating deficit approached $1 million a year and was worsening.” (source A). Losing money is never good for a business, but with a constant influx of money from customers, exhibits can be expanded for the public to view. The price of an artifact should be cheap so the museum cannot lose from it, but expensive to bring the public to spend money seeing it. “…exhibitions and acquisitions were often approved without regard for overall policy guidelines or the museum’s fragile financial condition…” (source A). Without proper leadership, policies can be broken and artifacts that are worthless will waste money. The curator who buys new artifacts …show more content…

Why was this artifact so famous, influential, hated, etc.? Why is this artifact still relevant in today’s time? What connection is there between times gaps? “…the National Museum of the American Indian acknowledges the diversity of cultures and the continuity of cultural knowledge…” (source C). This continual line reflects on past and present knowledge on the Indian culture. The significance should also be weighed to a corresponding exhibit. There may have two items that cost about the same, but one is more significant for a certain exhibit. If you’re hungry and you have 20 dollars, you’re going to go to McDonald’s and get food instead of getting a new shirt. Historical and modern relevance should be balanced by the curator in order to obtain the more appropriate

Open Document