Cosmopolitanism Analysis

558 Words2 Pages

One of the issues that I found compelling due to all its contradictions is the so-called "cosmopolitanism" as an identity mark of the advertising men (as it is highlighted by "Apostles of Modernity" and "Sold American", too). How was possible to build up this self-perception in a profession that happened in a desk, from 8 am to 5 pm? How much cosmopolitan was this? To me, this is also part of what McGovern points out on the distinction as a key force that plays a role both in advertising men and advertising as an industry itself. This operation -being cosmopolitan, being distinguished from the mass, being the Opposite to the others- defines the world in which the ad men and the Other (women, children, blacks, immigrants, workers, and so on, they were undistinguishable) lived -and still …show more content…

Indeed, despite the fact that many brands mentioned are well-known only at an American level, there are many with not only deep roots in American history but tied relationship abroad, at least in Latin American experience: Coca-cola, Ford, AT&T, Kellogs, Van Camps, Proctor&Gamble, just to mention a few, have also shaped Latin American daily, economical, and political lives. So, I see these brands that contributed to forged a national and cultural identity in the US but also they are linked to cultural and popular Latin American culture. Therefore, I wonder if this double movement (casting national identity as well international one) can give us new insights to what McGovern argues (for example, as the US as an international, cultural, popular force that operates beyond its own boundaries. And doing so, helped to expand the capital and the production of goods and services. That is, if they own geographical boundaries weren't enough to consume the entire national production, the capital goes away in order to found new consumers, new markets, and new ways to shape

Open Document