Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on cosmetic animal testing
Cosmetics testings on animals
Animal testing in the cosmetic industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on cosmetic animal testing
Using dogs in cosmetics testing should be illegal. How many of you have dogs? Well you must have already known that mice and monkeys are used for cosmetics testing. But did you know dogs are used for testing too. Cosmetics like mascara and eyeliner are tested on dogs before they are put on store shelves. More than 65,000 dogs are held in U.S. laboratories each year, with over 25,000 subjected to painful experiments. And 95% of the dogs tested were not protected by the Federal Animal Welfare Act. When testing dogs, they often apply the cosmetics to their eyes and skins to show how it would affect a human. Beagles are the most the popular breed to use because they adapt well to living in cages, and are inexpensive to feed. The laboratories get
SUMMARIZE: The article grants information on new models in cosmetics to take the place of animal experimentation. It goes on to talk about how the European Union has now banned using animal-based test for cosmetic reasoning. Pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies have been using computer-like tools to assess the toxicity it has for years. The author incorporates information on cosmetics and the outlook on further research. ‘According to experts, combination of laboratory-based with virtual work will be the future of testing and is progressing faster than they expected.” (87 words)
The use of animals to test cosmetics is introduced in their article as well. The authors quote a vast amount of credible sources from prestigious universities such as Princeton and from well known animal rights group such as PETA. I will use this as my main source of information.
Why is animal cosmetic testing still happening? Cosmetic testing on animals has been dated back to the early 20th Century, before War World II. Healers and makers of medication anatomized animals with an interest in collecting understanding for their research. One physician, named Galen, declared he would rather use a pig as a test subject to “avoid seeing the unpleasant expression of an ape” (Gross 36). However, the morality of animal cosmetic testing has always been questioned. Humans don’t want to consider animals as being on the same level as us, but they are just as important as us. In the 1920’s, the usage of vaccines and drugs were performed experimentally and conducted on breathing animals, without turning their minds to think how similar animals are, just like us. Animals grieve and have emotions. Known for his disturbing procedures, Relado Colombo would dissect a fetus out of pregnant dogs and then rub burning vaccines on it in front of the mother. Despite her own suffering, the mother dog would bark uncontrollably until her pup was by her side (Monamy 9). We now speak for animals, because this proves we are the voice for protesting against animal cosmetic testing or allowing them to go through any more horrifying procedures. We must outlaw animal cosmetic testing, so animals don’t have to suffer; there aren’t enough proven results to regard it anyway.
Animal testing has been used for developing and researching cures for medical conditions. For example, the polio vaccine, chemotherapy for cancer, insulin treatment for diabetes, organ transplants and blood transfusions are just some of the important advances that have come from research on animals (“Animal Testing”). Consuming animals for research benefits in developing various treatments and also benefits in discovery better methods for cures. According to the article “Animal Testing”, it says that the underlying rationale for the use of animal testing is that living organisms provide interactive, dynamic systems that scientists can observe and manipulate in order to understand normal and pathological functioning as well as the effectiveness of medical interventions. It relies on the physiological and anatomical similarities between humans and other animals (MacClellan, Joel). Meaning that animals have the same body components and features as humans and is the best thing to research on to better understand the human development. Even though several argue that animal testing is harming the animals, one has to think back to all the benefits that has come from it. There may be a little remorse for endangering animal lives, but realizing how far medicine has come makes it worth the while.
There are several safety precautions that we as humans take to ensure our safety. Humans most commonly test things before selling or using them. This can avoid liability and make sure products are safe. Cosmetics are among the many types of products that are being tested such as fragrances, toiletries, and cosmetics that are tested on millions of animals each year. This has created several controversies between animal rights activists and cosmetic manufacturers. Especially in the European Union Council of Ministers where they want to ban animal testing as soon as they can develop enough alternatives (Milmo, 6). This is because several animals are used in experimentations to test if products are safe for us to use. Tests like the Draize Irritancy and Skin Tests, where products are put in the eyes of rabbits to test irritations, and the LD50, where several animals are exposed to a chemical are considered ways of torture. But luckily several corporations are discovering new and reliable ways to replace animals with science and technology to help reduce the amount of animals used. So because testing on animals are absolutely necessary for our safety, as consumers, we do not have the right to use animals in this type of manner, but we should reduce the amount of tests by replacing many with alternatives.
In the article, “Animal Testing and Its Gifts to Humans,” Frankie Trull claims through pathos that the use of animal research is a necessity for the creation of new treatments. Trull opens by saying that animal research has provided another new treatment that is saving lives. He highlights that there is a new treatment in result of animal testing and opens his argument in contest of this treatment to establish a form of pathos. Through medical research animal models are indispensable and play a key role in creating treatments. Trull highlights another major breakthrough cure for Ebola that originated through animal research. Next, Trull presents a study ran by Duke University that relied heavily on animal research. He reports that due to
Animal testing has continued to be used throughout the makeup industry, with over 200 main stream brands actively testing on animals (PeTA, 2012). Some of which include prestigious brands such as Clinique, Elizabeth Arden and Lancôme. The need for change comes as animals are continuously being exploited by these large companies.
Animal testing is cruel and unnecessary especially for cosmetic use. There is over a thousand ingredients that have been mark as safe for humans so there is no reason for animal testing. There are many alternatives for animal testing that are cheaper and give valid results, there are places like Europe that have ban animal testing and doesn’t not buy cosmetics from other places if they have been tested on animals. Since is not legally required to test cosmetics on animals, cosmetics companies have a choice to choose, but usually choose to experiment on animals. Many animals have dies or are seriously injured for the cause of animal testing and some animals that have been born in the labs haven’t even seen daylight in their life. There has been many reports of animal cruelty in these lab and some have been shut down for that reason. If there is many animals in this world that are being extinct, why speed up the process with other species by using them as experiments and killing
Why should animals have to die, just for humans to have cosmetics? It is understandable if you want to cover up a scar on your face, but to just wear makeup because you think you need it, or because you feel like you cannot live without it, is ridiculous. Animals should not be dyeing for our insecurities on how we look, or on how society judges us. If society sees someone who is not Barbie or Ken perfect they judge us, so we put makeup on, it is not right for society to do that. Because of their judging cosmetics is being tested on animals, and many of them are dying.
Every year, it is estimated that hundreds of millions of animals are used for experiments worldwide (Cohn). In those millions, an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 animals are used to test cosmetics alone (“About Animal Testing”). The tests are meant to irritate the animal’s skin and harm them for the sake of testing. These processes have been done for many years, but with the rise of new technologies and discoveries, there is no reason that companies should keep doing it. Along with this reason, animal testing of cosmetic products should not be allowed because it is cruel and inhumane, there are other effective alternative methods, and it simply isn’t necessary anymore.
Animals should not be a part of product testing. Testing drugs and products on animals is cruel and inhumane. Animals are living creatures too, and it’s not fair that they are being treated like another object. Animals that are being used for testing are usually getting force fed, forced inhalation, usually have food and water deprivation, and are often killed. The Draize eye test is usually on rabbits and is the testing of cosmetics and shampoos to see the irritation that occurs, these rabbit’s eyes are held open with clips and are not allowed to blink away the product.
Cosmetic Testing on Animals Every year, millions of animals suffer and die in painful tests to determine the safety of cosmetics. Substances such as eye shadow and soap are tested on rabbits, rats, guinea pigs, dogs, and other animals, despite the fact that the test results don’t help prevent or treat human illness or injury. Cosmetics are not required to be tested on animals and since non-animal alternatives exist, it’s hard to understand why some companies still continue to conduct these tests. Cosmetic companies kill millions of animals every year to try to make a profit.
Cosmetic animal testing has been a controversial topic for decades but has recently gained more attention from the media due to oppositional organizations such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Those in favor of animal experimentation make the argument that they are taking animals’ lives to save humans’, but is it really necessary to subject animals to torturous conditions or painful experiments in the name of science? Animal experimentation needs to be abolished because it is unethical and selfish to destroy an animal 's life.
It still comes as a surprise to me that with all the technology in today’s society, we are still relying on animals for cosmetic research. Some people think that it is acceptable and even justified to test on mere animals rather than risk hurting people. So, for these kinds of people, animal testing makes perfect sense. However, in my opinion, animals are living creatures and have the right to live out their lives as nature intended rather than simply surviving in cages while being poked and prodded with whatever scientists fancy. I think it is depressing and sort of grotesque that I am using products that have been tested on animals that are even commonly bred as our pets. So, I began my research to find out what companies still test on animals, why they do so, and what other alternatives they could use in place of animal testing.
Many of the products our families use daily were and still are tested on animals everywhere. The animals used in cosmetics and personal care products such as, lipstick, shampoo, cologne, etc. Guinea pigs and rabbits are usually used for the testing of toothpaste and mascara. Each ingredient in a cosmetic or household that needs to be tested runs through a various number of tests. These tests are done to test allergic reaction on skin, skin irritation, eye irritation, to determine the amount of a substance that can be applied or used at once, changes in cells and organs, for cancer, for effects on fertility, ability to reproduce, and birth defects, measures the absorption, distribution, and metabolism of a substance throughout the tissues and organs, and the r...