Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Limitations on intellectual property protection
Intellectual property protection in an electronic environment
Limitations on intellectual property protection
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Limitations on intellectual property protection
Developing a policy for Management
The prevention and management of Copyright infringements.
In order for management to understand how to prevent and manage copyright infringements it is important to understand what a copyright is and what it means when a copyright is infringed.
A copyright is defined as the legal right created by the law that governs a country, that in turn grants the creator of original work exclusive rights for use and distribution for the work that is deemed as a copyright. A copyright is therefore seen as the intellectual assets of a company, from which they use to generate a profit. It is therefore of utmost importance that a company works hard to ensure that their copyrights are not infringed, and that management is
…show more content…
1. Management should educate employees on copyrights and the infringements of copyrights so that the employees are aware if they are about to infringe a copyright
2. All copyrights should be protected with Terms of Use and a disclaimer
3. Management should be aware of what intellectual property of the company is protected under the Australian Copyright Act of 1968 and should continuously train employees on how to correctly use the assets of the company without infringement.
Ways management can educate users to prevent copyright infringement:
Copyright infringement is rarely an accident in the workplace and it can easily be avoided.
Whether the user is dealing with a line of text, an image or a song, users may try to justify this as simply “borrowing” the work, but this is completely unacceptable. To avoid infringement the user should simply be creative rather than relying on existing material to use for their own work.
5 ways to avoid copyright infringement:
1. Assume the work is already copyrighted
- Having this mind-set to work found online will greatly assist with avoiding copyright infringements. Just because the work is freely downloadable does not mean that it’s free to
…show more content…
Review and retain licensing agreements.
- License agreements are required for work obtained through stock agencies (for example Shutter Stock for stock images). The user will need to review these agreements as they contain the terms on which you are purchasing the licence and any applicable restrictions.
4. Set up an IP policy for your business.
- An intellectual property (IP) policy is a set of guidelines. These guidelines provide employees with the principles applicable in dealing with intellectual property that belongs to third parties and businesses. An IP policy is an effective means of protection against unintentional infringement.
5. Talk with a lawyer.
- Copyright can be very complex and failure to follow these rules can result in serious legal consequences. Legal advice should be sought-after on how to prevent copyright infringement and ensure your business complies with the law.
The law that protects intellectual property and prevents copyright infringements in Australia is the Australian Copyright Act of 1968. The act as amended in the year 2004, protects the intellectual property of an author who has passed for up to 70 years after their passing.
The Australian Copyright Act of 1968 covers;
1. Literary works
2. Dramatic
The central message of this text is that increasingly, outdated copyright laws are being manipulated and put to use in a ludicrous manner. This is resulting in the suppression of people’s ability to generate and share their own creative expressions.
Over the past decade the societal view of creative society has greatly changed due to advances in computer technology and the Internet. In 1995, aware of the beginning of this change, two authors wrote articles in Wired Magazine expressing diametrically opposed views on how this technological change would take form, and how it would affect copyright law. In the article "The Emperor's Clothes Still Fit Just Fine" Lance Rose hypothesized that the criminal nature of copyright infringement would prevent it from developing into a socially acceptable practice. Thus, he wrote, we would not need to revise copyright law to prevent copyright infringement. In another article, Entitled "Intellectual Value", Esther Dyson presented a completely different view of the copyright issue. She based many her arguments on the belief that mainstream copyright infringement would proliferate in the following years, causing a radical revision of American ideas and laws towards intellectual property. What has happened since then? Who was right? This paper analyzes the situation then and now, with the knowledge that these trends are still in a state of transformation. As new software and hardware innovations make it easier to create, copy, alter, and disseminate original digital content, this discussion will be come even more critical.
Intellectual property is an incredibly complicated facet of the law. In the United States, we have many laws in place to control and limit profiting from others intellectual property. The issue is not only profiting from others intellectual property, but not purchasing the property from the originator as well. We will discuss why it is important to protect this property as well as why it is tremendously difficult to regulate all these safe guards. “Intellectual Property has the shelf life of a banana.” Bill Gates
“Copyright is a fundamental right of ownership and protection common to all of the arts” (O’Hara & Beard, 2006, p. 8). “It is a form of intellectual Property (IP)” and it gives the owner exclusive rights to the copyright (O’Hara & Beard, 2006, p. 11).
Copyright is not a natural process; it is essentially an agreement between the state and an artist, where the state gives the artist a monopoly on works they make for a certain time in hopes that this artist will continue to create more works. This agreement is beneficial for all parties; the artist gets money for their work (as no one is allowed to produce copies unless granted permission) and an incentive to create new works. The state has artisans to keep the public happy.
...ts new and old artist from having their original forms of expression stolen. A performing artist or songwriter should have a good understanding of the factors of the copyright law. An artist always wants to protect their work so the wrong people can not abuse it. By having a deep knowledge about the copyright law, the artists can save themselves from paying endless unnecessary legal fees.
Plagiarism, or the unaccredited use of another's work or ideas, has become more and more of a problem in recent times than it was in the past. According to statistics found in a survey conducted by the Free Press, 58% of high school students let someone copy their work in 1969, but by 1989 this number had risen to 97%. The expansion of the World Wide Web and the number of people accessing the Web on a regular basis has caused an epidemic of plagiarism in this country, especially among students. This is a serious problem that must be addressed because many students feel that if they are not getting in trouble for cheating, than it is okay.
Intellectual property (IP) is defined as property that is developed through an intellectual and creative processes. Intellectual property falls under the category of property known as intangible rights, which includes patents (inventions of processes, machines, manufactures, and compositions of matter), copyrights (original artistic and literary works of), trademarks (commercial symbols), and trade secrets ((product formulas, patterns, designs). Intellectual property rights has a significant value to both individuals and businesses, providing in the case of large companies, over one half of their value on return. Since intellectual property rights are so important to the U.S. economy and its citizens, federal and state law provides protection, for example, civil damages and criminal penalties to be assessed against infringers. Due to the importance of intellectual property to a business, I don’t think that its protection and enforcement is going to be a thing of the past.
There are many reason that why is it important to protect one’s intellectual property. Some of the reason are Creator being accused as a theft, Loss of Reputation, Loss of income, Loss of Asset and Loss of Authority Rights.
Just two decades ago, saying “copyright” to teachers most likely conjured images in their minds only of the fine-print notice in the front of a textbook. Today, with a world of Web 2.0 technology at their fingertips, copyright issues for teachers can be confusing and complex. Add to that an ever-increasing emphasis on technology literacy in our states’ education standards – forcing teachers to incorporate applications and resources that may be uncharted territory to them – and the waters get even murkier. Teachers bear the double-burden of carefully abiding by copyright laws in their day-to-day incorporation of technology in the classroom, while instilling copyright ethics in students as they meet state standards for technology and media literacy. A review of the copyright literature related to education provides some clarity on copyright and fair use applied to classroom practices, suggests barriers to copyright compliance among educators, and provides suggestions on how to teach copyright ethics to a tech-savvy generation.
Plagiarism and Copyright Infringement are two terms that mean different things yet are routinely mentioned as synonyms for each other. This is not the case. The underlying reasoning for people who choose to plagiarize and infringe on copyrights involve some of the same ethics and morals, but from a legal standpoint these terms mean different things. This paper will point out the similarities and differences between the two terms. It will first give some meaning and perspective behind each term then it will go into the details of what each term means. It will point out the types of plagiarism that routinely show in academia and what is covered under Copyright law protection. It will go on to compare and contrast the two concepts.
However, in recent years, it is not uncommon to see copyright in the possession of a third party other than the creator. These companies make use of copyright as an investment and financial tools to gain profit. In this case, the use of copyright loses its original purpose of protecting the creator, but used as a mean for financial gain. This could possibly hinder creativity as innovation becomes a financial tool catered to the tastes of the general public, while the less marketable new ideas goes unnoticed by the general public under the copyright laws. It is crucial to note that online platforms such as blogs, Facebook and Youtube, and people making their music/works available online for free shows the rapid surge in the number of people willing to sacrifice their copyrights to market themselves to the world. In this highly saturated market, copyright laws can become less relevant as marketing and business is placed on higher
Intellectual property is information, original ideas and expressions of the persons mind that have profitable value and are protected under copyright, patent, service mark, trademark/trade secret regulation from replication, violation, and dilution. Intellectual property includes brand items, formulas, inventions, data, designs and the work of artists. It is one of the most tradable properties in the technology market.
...n a situation that can and should always be avoided at all cost. Someone should never try to take credit for someone else's hard work and effort. Similarly no one should try to get rich off of someone else's logo without proper consent. With all of this being said about plagiarism and copyright infringement, people should really strive to just be original! Be original since you were not born a clone or born to be someone else.