Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social corporate responsibility
Social corporate responsibility
Corporate social responsibility in the business world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social corporate responsibility
2.7 The nature and approaches of Corporate Social Responsibility As the environment is damaged due to operations of corporations, more attention should be given to the environment as there is a nexus between environment and development. Environment is where we live; and the development is what we all do in attempting to improve our lot within the abode. The two are inseparable, For example; many companies in the apparel industry have outsourced their manufacturing to developing countries like China, India, Bangladesh and Pakistan, to increase their competitiveness by lower manufacturing costs (Pretious and Love, 2006). To control the conditions for the employees in those factories is often a difficult task for the apparel companies. Poor conditions As to why Cooperate Social Responsibility gets started, some authors argue that Cooperate Social Responsibility can be seen as either an integral part of the business strategy and corporate identity, or it can be used as a defensive policy, with the latter being used more often by companies targeted by activists. The rationale for Cooperate Social Responsibility can be based on a moral argument, a rational argument, or an economic argument (Werther & Chandler, 2006). Campbell (2007) is representative of a group of studies that create testable propositions related to the conditions under which organizations will move towards Cooperate Social Responsibility. He sees corporations’ level of social responsibility as being influenced by factors such as financial conditions of the firm, health of the economy, and well-enforced state Cooperate Social Responsibilities are the “societal expectations of corporate behavior; a behavior that is alleged by a stakeholder to be expected by society or morally required and is therefore justifiably demanded of business” (Whetten et al., 2002). Hayek (1939) also considered much higher rate of profit would be obtainable on money spent on labour than on money invested in
Our textbook defines corporate social responsibility as “a business's concern for the welfare of society” (Nickels, 102) and that it “goes well beyond being ethical. It is based on a commitment to integrity, fairness, and respect” (102). By performing a social audit they can evaluate whether or not their policies and actions are actually providing the support they’re attempting to
In most cases, profits and social welfare are at odds. In such a case, business executives being answerable to shareholders are likely to focus on the profit-making aspect of the business rather than going against the interest of their shareholders by promoting social welfare at the expense of profits. In addition, research shows that companies actively involved in Corporate Social Responsibility efforts are more likely to be targeted by activists (Kress, 2011). In fact, it has been established that many companies initiate corporate social welfare projects when they stand to gain from those projects. For example, automakers resulted to creating fuel-efficient vehicles when they became profitable; similarly, energy conservation became an important CSR activity when the cost of energy became very costly. As such, the companies are benefiting their society as they follow their own
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a movement that aims to promote a greater awareness of how business activities and decisions influence corporate environment, stakeholders, and society in general. Adam Lindgreen and Valerie Swaen’s article “Corporate Social Responsibility” addresses this broad topic in a more narrow direction of CSR implementation as it discusses the most important stages of this process. While this article relies only on the previous research, it provides unique insights into CSR and even challenges the common views of this concept as the authors thoroughly analyze their secondary sources.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a word that is bandied about with really little regard as to what the full implications actually are. Consider a few thoughts: What exactly is a corporation’s responsibility? Who are the arbiters of CSR for corporations? What does it cost to “rein in” corporations? Why are some companies held to a different standard than others?
To supply the wants and needs of a consumer, society entrusts wealth-producing resources to the business enterprise.” (Santayana, George. Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending? So before we go into greater detail on the different perspectives related to social responsibility, one might question the meaning of social responsibility. It is generally agreed that social responsibility is defined as the business obligation to make decisions that benefit society.... ...
Corporate social responsibility is in many ways is tied to the values and ethics that a business believes in. While CSR encompasses the economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary responsibilities of organizations, business ethics usually focus on the moral judgments and behavior of individuals and groups within organizations. In their text, BUSINESS AND SOCIETY: ETHICS, SUSTAINABILITY, AND STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT, Carroll and Buchholtz's give a four-part definition of CSR that incorporates the multi-faceted nature of social responsibility. The expectation that businesses will produce goods and services that are needed and desired by customers and sell those goods and services at a reasonable price, is the key to the economic responsibilities that are cited in their definition. Organizations are expected to be efficient, profitable, and creative to keep shareholders welfare in mind. In the western corporate structure, fair competition in the marketplace is not only the leg...
McWilliams and Siegel (2001) define CSR as, “actions that appear to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by law.” (p. 117) Corporate social responsibility is considered both strategic, in that it yields a firm benefits, and non-strategic, in that it encompasses an observed behavior (Burke and Logsdon 1996). There is also a perception that CSR encompasses a zero-sum trade-off with the economic interests of the business. It is somewhat accepted that accepting CSR strategies will be a more long-term payoff, while entailing short-term costs, leading modern businesses to abandon it in order to appease the interests of shareholders.
The reputation of social responsibility between industries has turn out to be a subject of community debate in today’s world. Numerous corporations are peregrinating a wall among what is gregariously responsible comportment and what is boldly and in plain view turning a back on the local communities. As community members, they have a responsibility to do whatever they can do to make as big as possible their effect on their native neighborhoods in a optimistic approach, all while making something as small as possible the negative as superlative as they are able to. The more social responsible the business is the more the community will give
In recent years, companies are becoming socially responsible and now stakeholders almost expect a company to have CSR policies. Therefore, in twentieth century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) became an important development in public life (Barnett, ND).Corporate social responsibility is defined as “the ways in which an organisation exceeds the minimum obligations to stakeholders specified through regulation and corporate governance” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). Stakeholders can be defined as “those individuals or groups who depend on the organisation to fulfil their own goals and on whom, in turn, the organisation depends” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). There are many purposes for this essay, the first purpose is to descried the key principles of corporate social responsibility and explain their importance for stakeholders. Secondly, is to show how far this company follows those principles in order to be accountable to at least three of its stakeholders. In this essay, three stakeholders, environment, customers and employees will be evaluated respectively and the key principles of the stakeholders will be examined.
With the company facing themselves in the context of globalization, they are increasingly aware that corporate social responsibility can be of direct economic value. Although the company 's primary goal is to create profit, companies can at the same time contribute to social and environmental objectives into their business strategy of corporate social responsibility as a strategic investment.
The corporate social responsibility is a commitment by a business to contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life for employees and their families’ as-well as contributing to the society. Walmart is a well-known company that offers customers the items they want and need at a low cost, with nearly 4,000 stores in the United States. According to the Fortune 500, Walmart was ranked number 1 in 2015. Just like any other superstore Walmart needs to continue the use of social responsibility by recreating a relationship between business and the community especially if they want to dominate the competition in 2016. The use of sustainability, strategic philanthropy, causing market, shared values, stakeholders and global perspective will help readers understand the purpose of social responsibilities in the corporate world.
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
In the article, The Truth About CSR by Kasturi Rangan, Lisa Chase, and Sohel Karim, the importance that coherence plays in corporate social responsibility (CSR), is emphasized. Throughout the article, corporate social responsibility application, within corporations, is broken down into three theaters. According to the article, many corporations do not focus on their CSR programs, and usually see these CSR actions as a secondary responsibility following the responsibility they hold towards their shareholders. It is argued in the article that in CSR is a key and essential block for corporate success, focusing on CSR coherence throughout all three theaters will bring positive results along the way, possibly making the corporation
In the current time of growth and progression, individuals should know that how a business not only flourish but sustain itself. Making profit is one of the main targets of every corporates but it must not be the only one. When an individual builds a company in order to do business, they should be well aware of their contribution towards the society as well as their business and employees in it. It is total strategy of all. We should be able to realize every increment contributes of it. One of the major factors that affect a business is how well it participates in Corporate Social Responsibility. According to (Werther & Chandler, 2006) corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a business practice that involves participating in initiatives that benefits the society. In authenticity, there is a whole lot to argue about it. There are no major guidelines that decides either a business is participating in Corporate Social Responsibility; what might be considered a Business practicing CSR to some, can still not be accepted for it by others. CSR may be restrained a term which his highly flexible. This paper will discuss about Corporate Social Responsibility and its
“Social responsibility is the responsibility of an organisation for the impacts of its decisions and activities on society and the environment, through transparent and ethical behaviour that: