Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transcontinental railroad modernisation
Transcontinental railroad modernisation
Transcontinental railroad modernisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Transcontinental railroad modernisation
Public transportation is a great way to get around. There is no driving to do, only relaxing. What if everyone was forced to only use public transportation though? Public transportation is transportation systems such as buses and trains that are open to the public. People should not be forced to use public transportation because it is bad for the environment, there would be too much infrastructure upgrades, and not everyone can access public transportation. Everyone using public transportation would be bad for the environment. Transportation is responsible for 15% of global CO2 emissions (Rodrigue, 2016). These CO2 emissions hurt the environment every day, and because transportation vehicles such as buses are much bigger than cars, …show more content…
As stated before, if everyone was forced to use public transportation then the transportation system would need to expand. By expanding the system, there would need to be changes to the roadway system, railway systems, and other forms of public transportation. If the infrastructure were to be upgraded and changed, then it would cause more construction. There would be construction to the roadways, railway system, and any other transportation system. These infrastructure upgrades are supposed to make our lives better, when in reality they are only a pain. Traffic would be created, gas fumes and the smell of tar would be in the air, and once again, the environment would suffer. With all of these infrastructure upgrades, there would be more changes to the areas around the transportation systems as well. Because the transportation system would need to expand, the cities and towns would need some changes as well. There would need to be space cleared for more transportation, city work or town work would be required and the city or town would be almost completely different (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2016). To clear space for transportation, buildings could be torn down. Spaces that were filled with green grass and beautiful flowers would be loud, noisy train stations or bus stops. Sidewalks and walkways would be ripped out, changing the ways that many …show more content…
Not everyone can use public transportation because it is not accessible to everyone. Most of the world's public transportation is in, or near, cities (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2016). While there are many people living in or near cities, there are some people who do not. For the people living away from the cities and in the country, it would be nearly impossible to use public transportation. They would have to walk everywhere, or walk for miles and miles just to have to pay for transportation. If using public transportation is just not an option for some people, then why would we force everyone to travel by it. It would be cruel and unfair to the people who live away from the cities to make everyone use public transportation. Not only can the country people not use public transportation, but the disabled can not use it as well. Many of the world's transportation systems are not wheelchair accessible (Shorack, 2016). This does not allow many of the disabled people around the world to use some public transportation. For a lot of disabled people and just people in wheelchairs, using public transportation would be nearly impossible. They would have to use their wheelchair to get around places which would take extremely long only to cover a short amount of distance. For the people who have to use wheelchairs, public transportation would be very hard
public transit networks. But just how serious is the burden of car ownership, and how exactly does
Since my freshmen year of high school, I have met peers who rely on public transportation to get to school every day since the school bus system did not serve their neighborhood. They were students who were eager to come to school everyday, relying on MTS to transport them to school on time every day. Similarly, my mother relies on MTS to get her to work on time every morning and home every afternoon. Both students and adults alike have had little to no problems with the transportation system; when there were problems, MTS was able to adjust their schedules or routes to serve the community. A friend who just recently began to rely on public transportation to transport her to school has told me the interesting experiences she has encountered during the time she has used the public transportat...
For now the more use are the airlines, buses, or trains. Many people use the airlines to travel to one place to another, and by building the railway it will decrease the number of people who ride the planes and it will decrease the amount of people traveling in car, too. The railway is not only going to decrease the amount of people traveling in planes, cars, or bus but it will also decrease the amount of time people take to travel in this kind of transportations. A reporter says, “Texas central is planning to build a bullet train route that cut between Dallas and Houston, Trimming about 2 hours off the average driving time, and saving over an hour compared to air travel” (“Proposed”). The railways will cut time for passengers to get to their destination but it will have a bad result later on. Some people agree on building this train because it will be faster to get to one place to another, but they are wrong because it will take costumers away from other transportations, and it will have an impact in the increase of how much each ticket cost. It will destroy land from does that live there. Researchers have found that railways benefit economies by bringing competition to transportation because people will be able to choose from all the varieties. The Researchers are wrong because airline will not have the same amount of people as they do before the high-speed train is build. Not only the airlines but bus stations because people will not notice other transportation. The airlines, the cars, and trains companies will change things from their transportations because they will want to be better than the railways. For example, technology or even the ticket prices. All they would want is to be better than the railway, causing more and more competitions, which means people will expand more on buying the transportation
If buses were more frequent and had accessibility to almost anywhere, there will certainly be more people using public transportation and less cars on the road. It is the same for other changes; Portland has taken great steps in utilizing renewable energy, recycling more than 50% of the wastes and improving water
In today's day and age, an increasing urgency must be put on the issue of transportation and its relation to society. Man owes it to himself to address the issue of transportation with practicality and, as one of the biggest polluters, ultimate discretion. One of the most practical and responsible forms of transportation available today is mass transit. However, a problem is present in American society in that mass transit is not as plentiful as it should be. Societies' across the globe are embracing mass transit much more quickly than Americans are. This problem can be remedied through proper education of the benefits of mass transit. Mass transit is the ideal future of travel for several reasons. Of note: “mass transit costs less to the community, needs less urban space, is less energy-intensive, pollutes less, is the safest mode, improves accessibility to jobs, and offers mobility for all” (1). Mass transit is also a highly flexible mode of transportation, with many different methods of travel available. Of note for these: metros, buses, carpooling, light rail, and waterborne transports. Proponents of mass transit claim it will find solutions to problems concerning the economy, the environment, and the energy crisis, as well as improving overall quality of life (2). Each of these ideas will be examined more in-depth.
Pollution is a major problem for all of us. People need to recognize this situation so we can start making a difference to this problem. In order to start making a difference, the federal government should increase gasoline tax by one dollar a gallon. Fifty percent of this dollar will go towards public transportation, since passenger cars and trucks are a major contribution towards air pollution, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, E.P.A (10/4, http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/emsns.html). Due to the expected increase after this is put forth, the remaining fifty percent of the dollar will go towards safety on these transits. When public transportation increases, air pollution will decrease, which will lessen the harmful health risks towards the environment.
However, those solutions are very expensive and require years to complete. Even though an increase in building more freeways will create less traffic, it requires a lot of work and money, which raises taxes on people’s salaries. A proposal to build a freeway tunnel that connects to the SR 710 in Los Angeles, CA to reduce traffic will cost approximately $1.5 billion (Analysis). Not only is the price outrageous, but also building a freeway means that many surrounding families will be affected because houses and business will have to be knocked down to create space. Public transportation’s cost is also high due to facility costs, external costs, such as accidents, and operating costs (Evaluating). Encouraging individuals to use public transportation is inconvenient because buses may go different routes from their desired destination, which causes people to walk for minutes or even hours. Public transportation can be effective for cities in the east coast like New York, where most of their businesses are close to each other. However, the case is different for the community living or working in the west because everything is separated, especially in Los Angeles
Public transportation has been a part of the American culture since the early 19th century when people would pay to take horse drawn carriages to places they needed to go. In fact it became so important in most everyone daily life that in 1964 the government passed the Federal Transit Act which is “transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and continuing general or special transportation to the public, but does not include school bus, charter, or intercity bus transportation or intercity passenger rail transportation” (Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia, 2015, 1p.). In Boston and New York City during the begging of the 20th century were both the first major cities to develop a subway system that are still used today. These cities
Public transportation is an essential part of a city. A good public transit can encourage a city’s economic activities and can provide its citizen a convenient life. Does our Phoenix public transit work well? Does it provide sufficient service to the citizen? From my experience, the answer is no. This November I tried to attend the popular State Fair in Phoenix. However, I found that there were not any buses or metros could take me to the fair directly. It means I need 2 hours or more spend on the public transits. As the sixth most populous city nationwide (“Phoenix Quick Fact” 1), compared with Los Angeles and other big cities in America, Phoenix’s public transportation is indeed subpar. Due to Los Angeles has 154 bus lines and 30 metros (“Schedule”), New York has 316 bus lines and 28 subways(“Maps & Timetables”), while Phoenix only has 98 bus lines, and the number of metro line is only one! (“Route Schedules & Maps”) The problem is
Should students take advantage of the public transportation more seriously than owning a car? The public transportation can solves to numerous problems; the bus transportation can be a universal antidote for bigger issues such as global warming. By taking the bus can save students’ time and money, rather than students who have a car have deal with traffic and expensive parking fee. Students who own a car might experience sitting in such a long traffic, where during the traffic cars may produce noxious gases relieving particle of air that can contribute the affect to human health. The public transportation is the best solution for an enormous population of students, so students’ needs to get on the transit a try. The transition system in the
First of all, the difference is in the facility or convenience. Travelling on public transport could be a waste of time due to waiting for the bus especially in the rush hours’ time. It is quite hard to wait for a bus and whenever there is an urgent work and you have to reach somewhere in a hurry, you might get late due to waiting for a long period. In contrast to traveling on public transportation, driving your own car is more convenient and reliable. People can start their car and can go to anywhere that want without any wait or suffering from different kinds of problems. Going to an event or meeting can be helpful in your own car as compare to public transport as it can affect your personality.
First of the difference between public transportation and private car is convenience in travel. There are many type of transportations that people can choose to travelling such as bus and van. People can save time to go work in morning and to back when they finished working. Even though, people have to go to work in a crowded bus, people can avoid and also less traffic jams from using their own car on the road. If they go to work or somewhere by private car, they will get serious when they get stick in their car for a long time. People do not have to find parking when they go out to work or shopping. Moreover, public transportation saves environment because it helps people decrease air pollution from using private car.
Rail transportation is a transportation in which for movement of people and goods which from one location to another destination. Rail had been takes the important role in physical and economic development of town and cities in a country and it was developed over the world. Rail transport can be made a property value in a country increase and it must be needs improvement in transportation network expanding (Goldberg, 1970). Thus, the railway services need to be done with continuous improvement and it is important to the rail passengers of the range and quality of facilities and service on stations and trains (Gleave, S. D., 2000). The future development to a public transportation is a key to affect
If you use public transport you spend on your journey as and when you need to travel, whereas if you own a car you are paying for it all the time, even if you are not using it, as insurance, tax and MOTs need constantly maintaining.
The most important reason why ownership of private vehicles should not be banned is that vehicles are an essential part of modern city living. Without vehicles, a lot of inconveniences will occur. For example, people would be forced to walk quite a distance to school, in the case of students, or to other places. They need to go through the hassle of waiting for and using public transport. This can be quite the problem in rural areas where public transport is unreliable at best and can even be non-existent. According to (Jong Gatoona 2010), One reason people avoid public transport is that it wastes valuable time. When it comes to going somewhere, public transit will in most cases take more time to reach the desired destination when compared to driving there. For example, 30-40 minutes of driving will instead take 45-65 minutes when public transit is used. This estimate of course does not factor the time taken waiting for vehicles to arrive i...