Contradictions In John Patrick Shanley's Doubt: A Parable

801 Words2 Pages

Through Sister Aloysius's contradictions and ambiguous motives, John Patrick Shanley demonstrates that the audience can’t know what she is thinking. Therefore, his play, Doubt: A Parable implies that humans are contradictory and mysterious by their very nature. Throughout the play, Sister Aloysius contradicts herself in her statements, demonstrating that an audience can’t know what she is thinking. When she first brings up the subject of Donald Muller, Aloysius tells Father Flynn that they “must neither hide Donald Muller, nor put him forward,” in other words, they must treat him differently from the other students (Shanley 30). Yet, when Flynn mentions that he was giving Muller special protections, she insists that Muller “must be held to the same …show more content…

Aloysius has doubts about Father Flynn, yet her motive for prosecuting him remains ambiguous. Sister James accuses Aloysius of one possible motive, bias against Flynn: “You don’t like it that he uses a ballpoint pen. […] You don’t like it that he likes ‘Frosty the Snowman’! And you’re letting that convince you of something terrible, just terrible!”(35). James believes that Aloysius is prejudiced against Father Flynn because of his disregard for her traditional values. Aloysius makes her hatred of ballpoint pens clear to Sister James by telling her that “the students really should only be learning script with true fountain pens”(9). Sister Aloysius believes her way, the fountain pen, is superior to Father Flynn's way, the ballpoint pen. In a similar sense, she tells Flynn directly that “[Frosty the Snowman] should be banned from the airwaves”(29). Again, Aloysius views Flynn’s methods as inferior. As Sister James fears, Aloysius could be letting her distaste for Father Flynn cloud her judgement. This could be her motive for accusing Flynn of something terrible, but the audience can’t be

Open Document