Conflict Management: Providing Quality Care

838 Words2 Pages

Providing quality care requires positive, collaborative working relationships among the health care professionals that form the team. In today's increasingly complex and stressful work environments, these relationships can be threatened by conflict. Identifying the underlying causes of conflict and choice of conflict management style will enable practitioners, leaders and managers to build an organisational culture that fosters collaborative working relationships and create the best possible environment to engage in effective conflict management.
It is easy to assume that many multi-disciplinary teams come together with the same set of goals and no conflicts present. However, this is not usually the case. Everyone, even healthcare professionals …show more content…

Understanding positive and negative conflicts in the workplace is an important part of being an effective leader and manager. Conflict in the workplace is not always a bad thing as it can lead to healthy competition, debate and better patient outcomes.
Conflict in healthcare can manifest due to different goals, or difference of opinion between staff or patients. Ultimately it is the responsibility of all healthcare professionals to ensure the safety and wellbeing of their patients and not allow any conflicts to get in the way of this.
Catterson and price (2008) suggest that conflict between the multidisciplinary team is more likely to arise when looking after a patient with complex needs.

Almost et al, (2016) identified a number of Sources of conflict including; lack of emotional intelligence, personality traits, various aspects of the job and work environment, role ambiguity, lack of support from manager and colleagues and poor communication.

There are a number of conflict resolution strategies:
Avoiding – individuals or groups withdraw from the conflict altogether. This can happen consciously or …show more content…

This is beneficial when there is a lack of time and both parties are very invested in the conflict.
Disadvantages – there is a looser and negative emotions are often involved
Compromise – this strategy involves no winner or looser. Each party sacrifices something to gain something in return.
Advantages – no clear winner or loser
Disadvantages – conflict may return if what was sacrificed is less important than what was gained
Negotiating – this involves both parties bargaining on a solution, There will be gains and losses similar to the compromising strategy. Although both parties come to a general agreement, a consensus is not the ultimate goal. Negotiating is used when both parties are invested in the conflict and the choice to resort back to conflict is not an option.
Advantages – Negotiating can be used for any type of conflict
Disadvantages – when an agreement is negotiated it is permanent
Confronting – this strategy takes action to halt the conflict at the very first sign of it.
Advantages – does not allow the conflict process to occur
Disadvantages – confronting may lead to future conflict as the conflict is perceived to be unacceptable. Conflict may

More about Conflict Management: Providing Quality Care

Open Document