Compasive And Being Persuasion In The Play Coriolanus

1411 Words3 Pages

In the play Coriolanus, the story’s namesake character struggles with capturing the trust and support of his people while more manipulative officials prevail. Coriolanus is a rather shy and awkward type who doesn’t wish to show off in grand gestures why he is a superior leader for the community. This play focuses on how persuasion is a very powerful tool in earning the support of other people as well as recognizing the value of an honorable background but is not enough by itself. The idea that in order to win the support of the people, it is necessary for people to understand that there is a balance between being persuasive and being honest. Coriolanus is not a persuasive person and his rivals are and that ultimately leads to his downfall. …show more content…

In the end, the persuasive and manipulative people win against Coriolanus and cause his downfall. Being persuasive plays off of the easily swayable mindset of humans and can convince others to follow based purely on words. In the first scene of act 1, the people in this society are easily swayed to believe that Coriolanus isn’t fit to be a leader for them saying they should kill him. They are led to believe that Coriolanus wants to strip them of their power and voice in what happens in the society. Brutus and Sicinius play off this shred of doubt and further convince the people of Rome that Coriolanus is an unfit leader. Brutus and Sicinius want to get rid of Coriolanus and after convincing the people of how awful having him as a consul would be, continue to state that they should go after him. Coriolanus’ refusal to show the people his wound and battle scars show how he is still abiding by the morals he has set for himself. He says he “he wounds to show you, which shall be yours in private” (Coriolanus 53) showing that he is not keen on flaunting his wounds to the public. He believes that his wounds are only his to bear and that it is wrong to show them to others in an attempt to win them over. Earlier in the scene, he is so appalled by being expected to show his scars that he got when “in his country’s service when some …show more content…

This play illustrates how important honesty and persuasion in an attempt to win over the people. Coriolanus attempts and fails to win over the people due to his failure to truly persuade Rome to view him as a worthy leader of their community while this sets the tone for Brutus and Sicinius to use their manipulative nature to win over the populous. Coriolanus’ lack of communication skills is his fatal flaw allowing more persuasive figures to take advantage of the opportunity and sway the people of Rome proving that honor and noble acts by themselves are not enough to grab and hold the support of the general

Show More
Related

  • The Common Man's Role In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    1176 Words  | 3 Pages

    is far more than deep skin. It becomes more and more clear that the common man is Rome because of the sheer quantity of them, thus making the most important people in the play, the public. The higher figures' success is dependent on his opinion and even though it may

    Read More

  • The Tragedy of Julius Ceaser: A Story of Abstract Gender Roles

    548 Words  | 2 Pages

    The issues involving The Tragedy of Julius Ceaser is an equivocal topic, although to narrow one down is to reiterate how the men and women are viewed in this society. This play written by William Shakespeare, he introduced numerous characters but there are a few focal characters that surface around the idea of a bend in gender roles. To clarify, the characters that illustrate this are Julius Ceaser, the romans leader, as well as, his wife Calpurnia; and the other being Brutus, Ceasers friend, and his devoted wife Portia. This book reveals how dominance was ensued in men, while women’s worries were taken into account, but when challenged by a man’s there was no decision to be made the man hurled toward their fellow man’s idea. They felt that the men made more logical decisions when in fact that was utterly wrong.

    Read More

  • Brutus vs Antony

    1056 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most predominate and important aspect In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main charaters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd,using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s.

    Read More

  • Honesty Fairness In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar And Butus

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the play many characters are not who they turn out to be. Julius Caesar is a very good judge of character, he does not ruts Cassius, he says “ He thinks too much man, such men are dangerous”( shakespeare,1.2.195). Caesar foreshadows now dangerous Cassius is, Cassius is one person who stabs Caesar. Unlike Caesar, Brutus trusts people too much to see who they are. After Caesar 's death, Brutus trusts Marc Antony to give his speech, but Cassius says “ You know not what you do. Do not consent./ that Antony speak in his funeral. I know you how much the people may be moved/ by that which he will utter.” (shakespeare,3.2.333-335). Caesar was an amazing military leader, Brutus was not. Before Caesar becomes king, he gained land back to Rome “ Julius Caesar has just returned to Rome after a long civil war in which he defeated the forces of pompey” (applebee) Caesar led his military to victory and has the chance to take full control of Rome. brutus is a humble military leader company to Caesar. After Brutus won his battle over Octavius’ army, he left his men begin looting. Instead of helping Cassius’ army “ O Cassius, Brutus gave the word too early,/ who, having some advantages on Octavius/ took it too eagerly. His soldiers fell to spoil/ whilst we by Antony are all enclosed .(Shakespeare,5.3.5-8) Brutus had a bad call when he did not send his army to help Cassius. With Caesars flaw being

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Coriolanus Personality In Othello By William Shakespeare

    412 Words  | 1 Pages

    It will be discussed whether Coriolanus’ difficult personality is due to his upbringing, and/or due to his own nature, men of his manner are not uncommon in the socio-political landscape, even in today’s day and age, and we may well be moved to wonder what formative childhood experiences shaped the personality of these difficult, although at times necessary leaders. Above all, Shakespeare's words seem to provide us with a simple, direct answer. But I intend to argue that the text also contains some signs that the history she provides is incomplete.

    Read More

  • The Manipulation of Perception in Shakespeare's Othello

    1210 Words  | 3 Pages

    This paper contains 237 words of teacher’s comments.   What one perceives is influenced by one’s environment. The setting and commentary surrounding events changes our perception of them. Any innocent gesture can be perceived in the wrong way with enough persuading from someone else. Even if someone has total faith in another person's innocence, they can be persuaded to doubt them through the twisting of events. Once just a small amount of doubt has been planted, it influences the way everything else is seen. This occurs throughout the play, Othello. In this play, Iago influences Othello's perception of events through speeches and lies, making him doubt Desdemona's fidelity. Iago uses his talent of manipulating events to exact his revenge on Othello. Iago's twisting of events in Othello's mind leads to the downfall of Othello as planned, but because he fails to twist Emilia's perception as well, he facilitates his own eventual downfall.

    Read More

  • Deception, Betrayal, and Exaggeration

    745 Words  | 2 Pages

    While reading the play “Julius Caesar”, deception, betrayal, and exaggeration were perceived throughout. Cassius was the character that fit these qualities the most. He can be compared to the former president, Richard Nixon. He was the United States 37th President of the United States. He was voted into office receiving great admiration for his speeches, and work he had previously done. When he was elected, it was the time during the Vietnam War. His goal as president was to have reconciliation (Sidey and Freidel). He gave great speeches by using rhetoric; a famous speech is 425 - Address to the Nation on the War in Vietnam, November 3, 1969 rhetorical devices that he used in that speech was by saying “Good evening, my fellow Americans” (Peters) it gave the audience a sense of familiarity within the audience, and Nixon (Zielenski). In Nixon’s “Checker’s Speech” he tells his side of the story and his role in the Watergate Scandal. In his speech he uses rhetorical devices including repetition and anaphora, “I say that it was morally wrong if any of that $18,000 went to Senator Nixon, for my personal use. I say that it was morally wrong if it was secretly given and secretly handled. And I say that it was morally wrong if any of the contributors got special favors for the contributions that they made” (The History Place ). In the same speech, he uses the rhetorical question, “Well, how do you pay for these and how can you do it legally?” (The History Place ). Lastly, in the “Checker’s Speech” he uses irony when he states “I have a theory, too, that the best and only answer to a smear or an honest misunderstanding of the facts is to tell the truth. And that is why I am here tonight. I want to tell you my side of the case. This is a us...

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Two Speeches in Julius Caesar

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.

    Read More

  • Animal Imagery in Shakespeare's Coriolanus

    823 Words  | 2 Pages

    Coriolanus in this passage is likened to a lamb. Even his friend and supporter Menenius sees that Coriolanus although feared by the people outside the walls of Rome is easy prey for Rome's own citizens. The second place in the play where Coriolanus is seen as pitiful is in Act 4 Sc...

    Read More

  • Figurative Language In Julius Caesar

    152 Words  | 1 Pages

    The theme of William Shakespeare’s work Julius Caesar is the effect that one’s words have on others through misinterpretation and the misconstruing of words. The power one has to change the mindset of another is done through persuasion in which actors such as Mark Antony and Cassius use throughout the play. Speech is an important factor in the plot developments of Julius Caesar. For instance, in Act III, Scene 1, Cassius convinces Brutus into killing Caesar, although Brutus did not want to be involved in the conspiracy against Caesar. In Act III, Scene 2, the two greatly opposing speeches of Brutus and Antony swayed the citizens into different viewpoints.

    Read More

  • Brutus Reason In Julius Caesar

    336 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rome is under complete shock over the dramatic and unexpected loss of Julius Caesar. The people are confused, so who shall they listen to and believe about this tragedy? Will it be the conspirators by having Brutus reason with the roman people or Antony with his heartfelt, persuasive words spoken? In act three, Brutus decided to speak first to the plebeians before Antony could praise Caesar’s short life. Little did the conspirators know, Antony was seeking revenge to the people who took Caesar’s life (III,i,254-275).

    Read More

  • The Tragedy of Julius Caesar

    1996 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...scene of Caesar; however, Antony never shows at the murder. Also, Antony compares the conspirators to irrational and beastly animals, and he retells the scene of Caesar’s death. Multiple people deceive others in order to manipulate them. Decius inaccurately explains Calphurnia’s dream, and he motivates Caesar to travel to the Capitol; as a result, Caesar dies. In a manipulative oration given by Antony, he manipulates the plebeians; the capricious plebeians decide they want to kill the murderers of Caesar. In the end of the play, Antony claims that Brutus exhibits an honorable man, and he explains that he favors Brutus. Octavius ends the play, and he agrees with Antony’s declaration of the honor of Caesar. Although manipulation frequently never ends in death, people today use manipulation for one’s own advantage: abusively, deceptively, cunningly, and aggressively.

    Read More

  • Coriolanus Character Analysis Essay

    536 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the play Coriolanus, the man by with the play is named is a complicated individual. There is complexity to his personality, and subtlety to his emotions. In Act III, from III.ii.91 to 139, Coriolanus goes through an extreme shift of point of view and emotion. He has a complete reversal from not wanting compromise with the common people citizens to begrudgingly accepting that he must. For any actor trying to play Coriolanus, the importance of understanding this scene is important to understanding Coriolanus as a whole.

    Read More

  • Coriolanus: Rome's New Republic

    448 Words  | 1 Pages

    Coriolanus is a play set in the time of Rome’s new republic yet the politics are balanced, the hierarchy in which the country is run has a good chance of working, but the play doesn’t tell us about the new fledgling democracy it focuses on the struggle for power in the hierarchy, the fallacy of humans. This will be discussed below by looking at Coriolanus, the plebeians and the tribunes. Coriolanus is a tragic hero, which means he dies in the play, but this could also relate to his inability to compromise for the greater good of the country, as this is inevitably the reason why he dies. Coriolanus hates the plebeians, as he says “you dissentious rogues” in the first scene of the play, this hatred is due to his value system. He hates poor people .This is why he dislikes the plebeians because they want corn for free from the royal stock.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Leadership Essay

    1068 Words  | 3 Pages

    Two powerful leaders, one power hungry whose ambitious ideas lead to his downfall, the other mindful of people who deserve their higher positions. A true leader is someone who has a vision, a drive and commitment to achieve what's best. In the play written by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, Brutus and Caesar are one of the main characters. They demonstrate leadership qualities that are still relevant to today. They are both very ambitious characters; however, they do so for different reasons and differ in their openness to others. There are many similarities and differences that lie between them. Both are noble and great men with loyal followers and neither man questions the rightness of his own path. Both made crucial mistakes that resulted in their death. However, Caesar acts out of love for for himself, his country, and to retain his power as ruler of Rome. Brutus on the other hand acts out of love for freedom of Rome. This essay will discuss and compare their qualities as leaders as well as their styles and how they are effective/ineffective in the play.

    Read More

More about Compasive And Being Persuasion In The Play Coriolanus

Open Document