More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of film on romantic relationships
Analysis of hollywood romance films
Classical hollywood techniques
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Love is something that nearly all people strive for, but many people struggle with the interactions required to find this love. Because of the difficulties people have with finding love, the idea of a matchmaker might sound enticing. In both the movies Hitch and Hello Dolly the main character is a matchmaker, and they each have their own ideas and techniques concerning getting the attention of a potential lover. Hitch was released in 2005, and Hello Dolly was released in 1969 and set in 1890, so it would stand to reason that the ideas and techniques considered viable would be drastically different in the two movies. However, upon viewing of both of these movies, that idea may be proven wrong. The opening scene of Hello Dolly has the main …show more content…
Therefore, it represents the views of the late 1800’s quite well. That time period was very much about keeping up appearances in order to maintain one’s social standing. This belief is demonstrated in how important the elegance of the first date was to the women in the movie. At that time, first impressions played an important role in deciding how the rest of the relationship would play out. That is why the first date and the introduction are so important to get right. The first kiss also carried a hefty weight with the characters in the film. The main goal of one of the men in the story was to go to New York and not return home until he had kissed a woman. The kiss at that time was a show of maturity. It was important for this character to make this next step of life into manhood, and it was a kiss that could do that for him. This is where Dolly came in; she gave him the knowledge necessary to get out with a woman on a date, and she educated him on how to make a date successful. With this knowledge, he was able to successfully get his first kiss. A kiss at that time meant a great deal, and the kiss in this film shows the truth to Dolly’s teachings on how to ensure a relationship can form. The ideas about love and finding love revolved around first introductions and good impressions. Respect was valued at that time. In modern times it seems like these basic ideas have changed, and the first …show more content…
This matchmaker, Hitch, deals only with male customers, and he focuses on getting them through their first three dates with a woman. One of his biggest ideas for making a good first impression was “shock and awe.” He told the men that they needed to do something impressive for the woman to get her attention in the beginning stages of the relationship. This idea, while it is more detailed and specific, reflects Dolly’s idea on the social introduction. Both of these matchmakers had the same philosophy that a first impression had great potential to start a relationship. Another of Hitch’s pieces of advice was about the first date; he instructed his clients on how to make a good impression and not mess anything up. He gave advice on how to show her the interest but also not to come on too strong. He was not so focused on elegance, but it was still important to be tasteful with the choice of date. In this example, Hitch’s advice was more specific again, but it does agree with Dolly’s ideas about keeping the impressions positive with the first date. The importance of the first kiss in this movie matches that of Hello Dolly. Hitch tells his clients that most women will judge the entire relationship on the first kiss, and he gives them some very detailed advice about how to carry out this action. Again, his ideas and techniques are in agreeance with those of Dolly. While Hitch’s
Strangers on a Train is one of Hitchcock’s most well-known films. It is typically analyzed in terms of the ways that the two main male characters interact. According to many film critics, homosexual attraction between Bruno and Guy is one of the premises of the film. This may be the case, however, many of these film critics fail to consider the minor characters of the film: the women. Specifically, they fail to analyze the influence of these women on the development of the male characters and to interpret the message Hitchcock is trying to portray about women, especially those with qualities typically not associated with women.
Surprisingly many cultures either avoid the discussion of love in marriage or spit on the idea completely. China and other societies believed that love was simply a product of marriage and shouldn’t get too out of hand, while a few Greek and Roman philosophers shunned excessive
Much of the relationship of When Harry Met Sally stems from the Attractive Theory. In this theory, it explains “the three primary forces that draw people together to form a relationship” which are based on proximity, attractiveness, and similarity (Alberts, Nakayama, and Martin 219). Although, Sally and Harry personality and lifestyles reflected different attitudes and values still they shared similarities in common friends, social group, and University. In addition to these similarities, the two simultaneously experienced a break up with their long-term partners, Joe and Helen. While each
...History of the Date” she does an efficient job in asserting her claim and strengthens it in various ways. She has a great amount of authority because of her occupation and personal education what the subject matter. Evidence is shown throughout the article to verify the allegation she asserts. Bailey appeals to the audience’s values and needs by exhibited feelings of belongingness and self-esteem. By also using slanted language and slogans, she adds to the support of her argument. The argument in the article was very effective and gives the reader more knowledge about the way dating used to be. Many people do believe that dating was better in different times, but as Bailey presented it was not perfect in older times as well. Dating will always receive negative opinions, but it depends on how we feel about the idea and the knowledge we have about the topic itself.
Teenagers like these were unique. They were given a chance to redefine the ways things were done in America. One of the conventions they put a new spin on, and consequently revolutionize, is the idea and practice of dating. The 1950's set up precedents in dating that led to what many consider "normal" dating today.
Growing up with different social circumstances, attending social mixers was an enlightening experience and once she made the move to Memphis, she gained a continual stream of suitors that accompanied her to such events. New opportunities emerged for Ida, giving her a sense of what life was like being a bachelorette in a land among woman seeking to marry. As an attractive, un-married woman in her mid twenties with an active social life she often generated suspicion and talk. Although Ida struck flings with many persistent suitors, her feelings have never been entirely clear in whom she ever truly loved. It was evident that she was not romanticized by the concept of marriage like many women were at the time.
Ellen Fein and Sherrie Schneider attempt to establish themselves as experts on the subject of dating and marriage early in the book, but what makes these women the authorities on what The Rules are, and how they work? They used them and are married. At least that is the only reason that the text provides. The implication made by Fein and Schneider that they are somehow more knowledgeable about getting the guy and success in marriage than people who have been married decades longer than them or even professionals is, at times, just laughable. The attitude conveyed in much of the support for their arguments seems to simply say "JUST TRUST US!" complete with bold type-face and an exclamation point. This is something that many modern women would look at as just downright silly, but there is a group of women in this world who may be susceptible to believing that "fairy tales do come true.
Premarital sexual relationships during the time period (1917) are extremely taboo. In the past if a young woman from a small town and a man from the city had an affair, it would end with the family of the wealthy young man paying for a place for the young women to raise the child. Wharton does not directly elude to sex between Charity and Harney but their afternoons and nights spent at the shack that they found together, we are supposed to infer that they are having a sexual relationship. Charity is becoming Harney’s love object and has no intention of marrying Charity, Grafton
Throughout history, views of love have changed. Anne Bradstreet valued love as a strong romantic bond. In Bradstreet's poem, "To My Dear and Loving Husband" she writes, "I prize thy love more than whole mines of gold, Or all the ritches that Earth doth hold"(51). In this excerpt, Bradstreet is speaking to her Husband. John Winthrop viewed love as a religious bond between all men. He writes, "Love is the bond of perfection" (39). Winthrop gives few references to romantic love. I personally think of love as something that people feel for each other just because they are both people. I believe there is an element of love between all people. Love is viewed differently by different people, but these beliefs have little to do with what time period these people lived in.
The 1967 motion picture “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” written by William Rose was a controversial film that touched on the subject of interracial marriage between two lovers, John Prentice a successful upper-class black man and Joanna Drayton an upper-class white woman in the 1960’s, the message depicted was that love conquers all as shown through the characters, John and Joanna, the setting in upper-class San Francisco, CA, and the theme of man v. society.
The silent film It (1927) portrays a particular type of women, one that is freed of certain societal and social conventions. In it, Betty Lou Spence (Clara Bow) is a shopgirl at a large, expensive department store run by Cyrus T. Waltham (Antonio Moreno). The film centers on a article recently published by Elinor Glyn, describing the modern girl and the traits most becoming of them, this so-called “It.” Which is described as something alluring, being sexual without exposing oneself, and have a magnetic quality that draws people in, and an enormous self-confidence. Hence, the film revolves around Spence, who displays all these traits as she tries to woo and eventually get Waltham to propose to her.
Through two main characters author involves us in a specific business going on between Leo Finkle, a lonely rabbinical student, and Pinye Salzman, a matchmaker. In order to get a good congregation Leo supposed to be married. How a man, who was studying for six years and who never was in a company of woman, easily can find a wife? The same way as his parents did. He went to the matchmaker. It was not so easy for Leo to appeal to Salzman, because he hoped to find the wife by himself. He wanted to be in love before he gets married. But he resorted to help. It was a firs time when he turned his mind over. Pine Salzman, the marriage broker, represented the old generation, and respected the old Jewish tradition. Marriage is a very important part of a Jew's life, and the family is more important than the girl herself is. He does not think about love. It is possible to imagine how Leo was disappointed when Salzmen introduced the girls to him. "Sophie P. Widow. Father promises eight thousand dollars. Has wonderful wholesale business. Also realestate." "Lily H. Regular. Father is successful dentist thirty-five years. Interested in professional man. Wonderful opportunity." Moreover, "She is a partikiler. She wants the best." Leo's interest to Lily was aroused, and he began seriously to consider calling on her. Finally they met. She provoked him to say the strange, but a very capacious and valuable phrase: "I think, that I came to God not because I loved Him, but because I did not." But Lily didn't dream about him, she dreamed about an invented hero. After this date he turned his mind over again. He felt that he could not love a girl. Although Leo returned to his regular routine, he was in panic and depression from one thought: nobody loves him and he does not love anybody either. There was no bride for him.
The next definition of love comes from Romeo, before he met Juliet. According to his definition, love is painful “Love is a smoke made with the fume of sighs” (I.i.197). “Is love a tender thing? It is too rough, / Too rude, too boist’rous, and it pricks like thorn” (I.iv.25-26). He keeps to himself, not venturing out much in daylight, or even allowing it into his room: “Shuts up his windows, locks fair daylight out” (I.i.142).
It is rather difficult to speak of love in an original sense today. If someone were to ask an individual to define love, a common response would be, “love cannot be explained, it cannot be defined”. This answer would be acceptable if love was equally felt for and between all people. But anyone would have to agree to the fact that there are different degrees and levels of love. Someone would not love his or her family members the same way they would his or her spouse. Love varies between different levels of action and feeling, and a definition of each level must be discovered in order to understand its varying power. Martin Luther King Jr. felt the need to address this particular issue when discussing the principles behind the non-violent student movement for civil rights. King felt that a working idea of love was the keystone to the philosophy of a non-violent protest. Turning to the Greek language and idea of love, King was able to define three particular levels, eros, philia, and agape. His goal was to take one of these three levels and use it as the definitive quality of the non-violent movement.
Love is affection, devotion, passion, desire, warmth, respect or loyalty. You choose. It doesn't really matter which one because they are all forms of love. Some are powerful and demand attention while others are more subtle and just below the surface. In recent years, love has drifted from these subtle levels to the more noticeable ones, namely passion. In my opinion, our society downplays the real necessity for genuine affection. By this I mean that we, as a society, spend so much time focusing on only one level of love (passion) that we tend to neglect and not recognize the need for closeness and trust (friendship). Love is an all-encompassing emotion that can be powerful and demanding, but also rewarding and pleasurable.