Comparison And Contrast Essay: The Battle Of Julius Caesar

After the death of Roman general, statesman, and dictator, Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, two very wealthy and powerful men of Rome, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus and Marcus Licinius Crassus began to grow hostile towards one another over power and leadership roles. Due to the fact that both men were backed by armies of their own, this was not viewed as a simple quarrel between two men. In efforts to avoid civil war, Julius Caesar suggested a three-way alliance. This unofficial partnership is known as the first Triumvirate. Having earned his title of Magnus for his countless victories and conquest, Pompey was Rome’s most famous general. Likewise, Julius Caesar was known for his eloquent speeches in the Senate, but it was his martial talents shown in Gaul and Britannia that were swiftly rising him up the ladder, making way for a new legend. Lastly, Marcus Licinius Crassus was not only a successful politician, but also the richest man in Rome. For

The Parthian army in total only had about 11,000 warm bodies, as opposed to the 40,000 men that made up the Roman army. General Surena and his army came prepared, knowing that they were outnumbered close to three times over. From this battle, one can also analyze the effectiveness of battle formations. Although Crassus was advised to set up his army in a proven successful formation, he decided to decline the advice and set the ranks in the way he thought would work. Lastly, this battle is significant to the study of Greek and Roman because one can review the different battle tactics that may or may not have been successful. By Publius seperating from the rest of the army, he made himself and his cavalry an obvious target. It can be assumed that if he would have worked with the Roman army instead of separating himself, the outcome for him and the Roman army as a whole could have been different, and possibly more desirable to the Roman