Comparison And Contrast Essay: Nathaniel Hawthorne And Frederick Douglas

643 Words2 Pages

When comparing these two realistic anti-transcendanlist essays, Nathaniel Hawthorne and Frederick Douglas brings out the full course of mankind’s negativity through literary details and description of a unknown territory. The first difference starts off with, “Dr. Heidigger’s Experiment”, a romanticism passage written by Hawthorne, which describes the unfilled greeds within man’s heart. And with that hidden agenda in tow, human’s would do anything - or give up everything - to be promised a given chance to renew their mistakes again till they are satisfied with better result than previously before. The greedy thoughts drawn onto the paper is stated, “- as is not unfrequently the case with old people, when worried either by present troubles or woful recollections” (Hawthorne), therefore it goes to say to the fact that even the eldest have hidden vendetta deep in their heart. In contrast, regardless of the few differences between Hawthorne’s romantic portrayal of humans selfish acts and Frederick Douglass’ …show more content…

Throughout the various passages between Hawthorne’s story and Douglass’ story, it's worth noting that both authors has inputted several imagery without the audience's having to search around. For example, with Hawthorne, he wrote, ‘It was scarcely full blown; for some of its delicate red leaves curled modestly around it's moist bosom, within which two two or three dewdrops were sparkling” (Hawthorne). Hawthorne describes the old lady, Sylvia Ward, her now youthful appearance to the beauties of nature. And with Douglass, he describes Mr. Covey’s watchful eyes, “He was under every tree, behind every stump, in every bush, and at every window, on the plantation” (Douglass), as a figurative way to initiate an illustration of Mr. Covey watching him and the other slaves working hard. Those two quotes allude to both the author’s usage of

Open Document