Comparing World War II And Winston Churchill's Their Finest Hour

442 Words1 Page

There were many important leaders in World War II, and Winston Churchill was one of these men. Many people believe he was one of the best Prime Ministers Great Britain has ever seen. He was a singular politician, but also a great solider, speech writer, and creative individual. He was a very well respected man before, during, and after World War II. In this essay I will give you the tone and mood of Churchill’s “Their Finest Hour” speech, and a description of the written, and audio version. The tone of Churchill’s written version is mainly providing interesting information, and delivers a patriotic sound. It too, has an Impactful an even tone. I feel that the emotion of the tale is intense, and powerful. The humor is almost inspiring, and bright. The tone and mood changes at the end where the seriousness of the situation is explained, then changes to the idea of leaving a place in history for this generation. When Churchill speaks, he pauses between every three or four words. In the speech I feel as though Churchill emphasizes the wrong language. For example, at the end of the speech the FINEST hour. …show more content…

He firstly starts off by saying that he is forming a war cabinet to establish a unified movement against the Germans. He also talks about the war lasting longer than expected, taking place on many fronts. Churchill’s speech reflects big on the reality of war, and the need for all British citizens to accept it. Churchill offered a solution to the tragedy of the war, which is victorious. One thing Churchill didn’t use in his speech is humorous, because he’s trying to prove he is focused, determined, and seriousness to win the war, and bring England to

Open Document