Comparing Virtue And Vengeance In The Tempest By William Shakespeare

416 Words1 Page

William Shakespeare once said,“The rarer action is in virtue rather than in vengeance.” In his final play, The Tempest, he was able to express both virtue and vengeance. Virtue is the ability to forgive, where vengeance is punishing someone who has wronged. After reading The Tempest, I came to the realization that there is more value in virtue rather than in vengeance. When a person forgives, that person is able to remove the weight from their shoulders. When a person seeks revenge, they will never receive true victory or closure. For example, in The Tempest, Prospero chooses to forgive Antonio, Alonso, and Sebastian. He does this only after realizing that trying to get vengeance on the three of them for driving him out of Milan wasn’t going to reverse what they did, or let him leave the island. By forgiving them, Prospero was able to return to his dukedom in Milan. Prospero achieved this realization only after attempting to seek revenge, coming to the conclusion that it was getting him nowhere. Shakespeare shows the process of elimination that an average human conducts. Prospero starts by doing the easiest thing possible, seeking revenge, just like the average human. In the end, a person realizes that getting revenge didn’t make them feel …show more content…

But, getting revenge won’t get rid of the situation, it only makes it worse. When someone seeks revenge it doesn’t justify what happened, it only makes a person stoop down to the wrong-doer’s level. For example, when Prospero made Alonso believe his son was dead because Prospero’s daughter could have died when he was driven out of Milan, he only stooped down to Alonso’s level. This shows because if Prospero believes that Alonso wronged him by putting his innocent daughter in danger, he contradicts this belief by doing exactly what Alonso did, by putting Alonso’s innocent son in

Open Document