Comparing The Stranger And The Exit

970 Words2 Pages

In our society, The Bible is considered one of the most famous written literatures, and within this book there is over a thousand pages explaining christianity entirely. However, Albert Camus is able to explain existentialism and absurdism theories in just a hundred and twenty five pages. But how does he manage this? Within the works of The Stranger by Albert Camus, and The Exit by Jean Paul Sartre, the authors help explain the meaning of existentialism through style, setting, and the characters in the story itself. Right away as you begin The Stranger, already you notice the unique writing style Camus decides to use throughout the book. He states, “I like milk in my coffee, so I said yes, and he came back a few minutes later with a tray. …show more content…

Alternatively, Sartre creates a hell that we do not think of what hell traditionally is depicted. In his hell, there are not devils, flames, people writhing in pain and agony. Instead the setting consists of a simple room with furniture that cannot be moved. It’s a room in which we find every day, and something we experience everyday. Individually a valet brings each character into this room where they intend to live out hell together for eternity. In this way, the author creates the idea that hell is everyday life, it’s all around us, and most importantly people are hell. Furthermore, there is no sleep, no bathrooms, no breaks, death is impossible, there is no exit. This idea is important because existentialism is based on the fact that we all exist in a purposeless, chaotic universe. Even if the characters could suddenly escape hell and visit earth, it wouldn’t change anything, and if it did it wouldn’t matter. Even when you affect other people’s lives it doesn’t matter, because there is not a purpose in life. Everyone is brought in to the word and you leave the world.Life and people would move on without you, and on earth life moves on as well, whether you want it to or

Open Document