Comparing The Gospel Of Luke And Acts Of The Apostles

1476 Words3 Pages

About one fourth of the New Testament is authored by the Gentile believer, Luke. The Gospel According to Luke and the Acts of the Apostles cover about 27-30% of the New Testament making Luke the greatest contributor and making the content and messages in which he presents extremely important and influential. Often referred to as the “companion” books, this paper will explain the relationship between these two works and make intelligible each book’s message in regards to the roles of the the apostles and disciples of Jesus Christ. The Gospel of Luke and Acts of the Apostles is an attempt to answer the theological problem/idea, of how Jesus Christ, Messiah of the Jews, came to hold an extremely immense non-Jewish Church. The Gospel of Luke covers very important sub-topics including family, love, women, poverty, wealth, sin, forgiveness, faith, and free will. It is evident that main theme in the …show more content…

We come to learn that Jesus is the Savior of all and for all, regardless of race, ethnicity, culture, socio-economic position, etc. Luke’s Gospel is the Gospel of “Universal Salvation”, fulfilling the words of the Prophet Isaiah, “Every valley shall be filled and every mountain and hill shall be made low… (Isaiah 40: 4 – 5). Luke often stresses the level of importance that the Holy Spirit has on both the ministry of Jesus as well as the Church. Three parables that are unique to Luke are the Parables of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37), the Friend at Midnight (Luke 11:5-13), the Rich Fool (Luke 12:13-21). These and many more parables discussed in Luke’s Gospel later give great examples of faith and lessons

Open Document