Comparing Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

675 Words2 Pages

Plans and dreams of animals and men can be destroyed without any reason. These people/animals plan ahead with the idea that they might be able to withstand nature and consequence, but their plans and dreams get destroyed. In the poem To A Mouse, Robert Burns describes a mouse whose plans of surviving winter were ruined by a farmer. He goes into detail about how this mouse has been making long plans, but chance ruined them without reason. This poem actually spawned the title for the book Of Mice And Men, by John Steinbeck. In Of Mice And Men, John Steinbeck tells the tale of two ranchers who have a dream in their head. This dream is that they will be able to buy a farm and tend to the plants and rabbits, but their dream goes awry. In both these texts, plans and dreams can be ruined without …show more content…

This quote shows the whole idea of the poem while using imagery and descriptive language. ”And nothing now, to build a new one, Of course grass green!” This quote from To a Mouse is about how a mouse’s house is destroyed and he has nothing to build it back. It is right near winter, and his food is also destroyed. His dream and plan was suddenly destroyed, without warning or reason. This supports the claim that dreams and plans can get suddenly ruined without any warning. By the same token, this next quote specifically supports the claim that plans and dreams can be ruined without warning or reason: ”In proving foresight may be vain”. This quote has the specific phrase that foresight is vain. Vain means useless or producing no result, and saying that foresight is vain is saying that plans and dreams are useless. Saying that foresight produces no result directly supports the previously made claim. The poem To A Mouse uses descriptive language and thoughtful phrases to form a claim that plans and dreams are ruined without

Open Document