Comparing Sappho's Fragment 16 And Bridal Ballad

690 Words2 Pages

Though they were written thousands of years apart, Sappho’s “Fragment 16” and Edgar Allen Poe’s “Bridal Ballad” each show how infatuation can often be mistaken for true love. In order to do this, each author depicts a character who is tormented by regret. In “Fragment 16”, Sappho points out that power can often become synonymous with beauty. Sappho is quick to disagree with this notion, instead arguing that love trumps power every time when it comes to beauty. To prove her point, Sappho uses the story of Helen to show how a desire for true love can lead Helen to abandon all that she knows. Similarly, “Bridal Ballad” depicts a woman who has made the fatal mistake of assuming that love should come with marriage, not the other way around. By contrasting this woman’s husband with the man she …show more content…

For centuries, mankind has strived to not only attain power, but to be around it whenever possible. In “Fragment 16” Sappho notes that “Some men say an army of horse and some men say an army on foot/ and some men say an army of ships is the most beautiful thing/ on the black earth” (Sappho 1-3). By opening her poem with three very masculine descriptions of beauty, Sappho shows her readers the basis of thinking of her time – namely, that with great power comes great beauty. Beauty, however, is subjective and although many people are attracted by power, Sappho believes that beauty stems from “what you love” (Sappho 4). To show her point, Sappho tells how Helen – thought to be the physical representation of ideal beauty – abandons her family and sails to Troy. Sappho’s full words may be lost to history, but her message is clear – even with absolute beauty, Helen is still led astray by the power of love. Sappho does not mention why Helen sails to Troy because this is not the point of the poem. The message that Sappho is trying to convey here is that too often beauty is mistaken for love, a notion that can lead only to

Open Document