Obama and Roosevelt believed in the same ideology of a peaceful world where neighbouring nations do not attack each other, though they spoke a different speech several years apart from one another. Both decided that they would need to defend other countries in order to obtain “freedom from fear” and that they would need to make sure that all people were safe from weapons that could be used against neighbouring nations. The main difference between the speeches, apart from the time and speaker, of course, is the mood behind the speech. In “The Four Freedoms”, Roosevelt begins with a somber tone, admitting the issues of the Great Depression to the people while informing them of his regret of stating said issues and being forced to speak the harsh …show more content…
So while the two’s speeches are different in their approach, there is still a vein of similarity in the way the tone and mood of the speeches develop. This same hopeful and inspiring mood in both speeches make them impactful to their audience and help develop an important belief. That the world could become a place where someone does not have to worry about whether their neighbour will attack their home the next or the next week or anytime in the future. By being alike in their manner of speaking about “freedom from fear”, Roosevelt and Obama help to sway their audience to believe the same way. They show that if two people from different times can agree on a peaceful future, perhaps that future is more likely to happen. A similar approach to such an important topic helps build hope in the people of the world and allows them to believe and fight for a time where they do not have to fight nearby nations. In fact, these two speeches and their similar message amazes me and persuades me to believe that, with an extreme amount of hard work, a peaceful world could be a reality in the far future. Based upon my observations around the current world, peace between all nations is a far-fetched
The approach, however, that was taken to deal with the matter is what will ultimately separate Hoover and Roosevelt when the debates to categorize the greatest and worst presidents the nation has seen begin. Hoover was known for false promises, as he would speak optimistically to his audience and never deliver. The people began to resent his words, knowing they would all fall through eventually. Roosevelt in his inaugural address knew the people were tired of hearing speeches that never pulled through and only spoke with truth as he stated: “I am certain that my fellow Americans expect that on my induction into the Presidency I will address them with candor and a decision which the present situation of our people impels. This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly.”
Both of these speeches talked about what each person wanted to do as president. Additionally they both talked about equality and how it is very important while being the president of the United States. They both talk about affirming the limits of power and unifying the country. They both relate things to Heaven and what Heaven and the bIble would think of problems. In paragraph 4 of Washington's Inaugural Address it states, “We cannot expect Heaven to smile upon a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right. Heaven itself has ordained these rules. The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the Republican model of Government, have been tied to this experiment entrusted to the American people.” In paragraph 9 of Obama’s Inaugural Address it states, “We remain a young nation, but in the words of the Bible, the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit. We must choose our better history. We must carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation, the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.” This Although Barack Obama and George Washington have many differences in their Inaugural Addresses there are also many
The U.S. president is a person deemed to be the most fitting person to lead this country through thick and thin. It’s been such a successful method that it has led to 43 individual men being put in charge of running this country. However, this doesn’t mean that each one has been good or hasn’t had an issue they couldn’t resolve when in office. But no matter what, each one has left a very unique imprint on the history and evolution of this nation. However when two are compared against one another, some rather surprising similarities may be found. Even better, is what happens when two presidents are compared and they are from the same political party but separated by a large numbers of years between them. In doing this, not only do we see the difference between the two but the interesting evolution of political idea in one party.
The election of 1912 signified a turning point in American history. Friends, Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft, competed against each other for the presidency. Though both progressive, they disagreed on how the country needed to run. Roosevelts ever increasing progressivism caused their stances on many important issues to be much different. Although, they did have some points on which they agreed. In what ways were Roosevelt 's and Taft 's stances on progressivism similar, and different?
Roosevelt's Four Freedoms Speech he states that he looks forward to, “a world founded upon
Oaths and promises were made by Franklin Roosevelt and Herbert Hoover in their inaugural addresses. Hoover and Roosevelt helped the country face the depression and transition into World War II. Both presidents’ inaugural addresses voiced concern and hope for the country. In their inaugural addresses, Hoover and Roosevelt expressed views about the future, the current situation, the challenges that were faced by our leaders, and how the Great Depression impacted the nation Hoover outlined his hopes for America’s future during his inauguration.
Within a minute of his address, Roosevelt begins talking about all of America’s “common difficulties.” He says, “They concern, thank God, only material things. Values have shrunk to fantastic levels; taxes have risen; our ability to pay has fallen. . .” (5). Roosevelt delivered this speech in 1933, when the Great Depression was at its peak. The public knew how awful conditions were nationwide; however, the president declaring they were bad is incredibly important. Instead of brushing off reality, Roosevelt sides with his audience, thus making him a more reliable and trustworthy figure in the eyes of the American people. By building that trust right away, the public has the ability to see Roosevelt as someone they can relate to, and strengthens the points he makes throughout the rest of his address. It is said that honesty is the best policy, and Roosevelt does a remarkable job of sharing the truth with his audience during his Inaugural
Roosevelt had led the U.S. through an economic depression and the greatest war in human history or, in other words, the “greatest crisis in American history since the Civil War.” A whole generation of Americans had grown up knowing no other president than Franklin D. Roosevelt. His social programs during the Great Depression redefined the role of government in Americans’ lives. His role during World War II established the U.S. leadership on a world scale and ultimately allowed America to be viewed as the greatest country on the face of the earth. In the end, FDR’s confidence, optimistic attitude towards the country, and his political experience helped rebuild America and make it great
The political philosophies of both Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt differ entirely through the approach of how America should be ran socially and economically. In Hoover’s New York Campaign Speech, his political stand point tilts for a republican agenda, supporting the idea of individualism and avoiding the spread of federal government, fearing that it will jeopardize the freedom of the American people. In other words, his philosophy revolves around the people self governing, following the “American system” and viewing individualism as a mechanism to help the economic distress. However, Franklin D. Roosevelt supports a democratic agenda, viewing the expansion of federal government to put America back on it’s feet. FDR does not see
“American power remains today what it was in the Second World War and the Cold War: the greatest force for freedom in the world” a quote from a man in the U.S named Elliot Abrams. Elliot Abrams was in fact a man who supervised U.S. policy in the Middle East for the White House. Having the guts to represent the people and stand for a side America didn’t care for, like Roosevelt and Kennedy. Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” speech and Kennedy’s Inaugural Address spoke about how freedom is important and as a country we need to help our country and others at our own sacrifice. However Roosevelt's speech was asking people to abandon the neutrality policy and send supplies and other aid to U.S allies. Whereas Kennedy’s speech wanted people to not use nuclear war and to consider the options. For freedom should be free to everyone, but men will use force than peace to gain power.
Ramsis #53 Mon. 4:00-6:40 History 110 Nobiletti 12/12/13 Four freedoms 11 months before the United States of America would declare war on Japan, President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivered a speech to the American people known as the “four freedoms” on January 6, 1941.1 The main purpose of this speech was to rally support to enter World War 2, however in order to declare war the United States of America had to abandon the isolationist policies that emerged out of WWI. These four freedoms would establish human rights after the war, but more importantly they would resonate throughout the United States for decades after the war. Some of these freedoms have remained the same, and some of these freedoms have changed throughout the years. We will be looking at three periods and comparing how the freedoms varied from each of the three periods.
All in all these two presidents had similar goals. They just achieved them in different ways. Wilson and Roosevelt were idealists who wanted the U.S. to be more active in world affairs. Both were willing to take drastic action to protect the United States. Roosevelt relocated Japanese Americans and enforced trade embargos on European and Asian nations. Wilson cracked down on Germany’s actions during WWI and the breaking of that agreement lead to Wilson declaring war on Germany. These actions have changed our history forever and the worlds. If it weren’t for US entering either war, Germany may have won and the world we know today would be way different.
“You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood for something. Sometime in your life.” - Winston Churchill. There will always be people who will stand against your views, ideas, and topics. Theodore Roosevelt and Equality 7-2521 from Ayn Rand’s Anthem had many others stand against them in their lives. Equality is a young boy who wishes to combat the individuality suppressing society he lives in. Theodore Roosevelt is a man who believes that he can make a change in the world. Equality was extremely influential in his efforts to regain the things that should have been granted to him in the beginning of his life. Theodore Roosevelt was not afraid to push the limits of his power in the presidential seat. Roosevelt displayed
During the 20th century many different presidents went in and out of the doors of the White House serving the country the best they could. However, two of these men hold a place in American history as perhaps the greatest leaders that had ever served our country. Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson are two extraordinary men that symbolize the hope and aspirations of the American people during such a tumultuous time in United States history. Both of these men held leadership qualities like no other, had strong views for America, and held exceptional ideas on foreign policy.
Even though they were both progressives, the two presidents had different paths in mind for the future of the United States. Their different perspective and priorities were evident in their speeches: New Nationalism by Roosevelt and New Freedom by Wilson. Wilson's New Freedom looked to the destruction of all trusts to promote economic competition and permit small businesses once again to flourish. While the federal government was to use its power on a one-time basis to bust all trusts, the federal government was to have no role in regulating business. Any regulation would have to be done by state governments. This contrasted markedly with Roosevelt's New Nationalism,...