Comparing Oryx And Crake

1356 Words3 Pages

1. Oryx and Crake are two of the major characters in the book. They are the two people Jimmy truly cares about, and thus their names acting as the title shows. The two combined represent the entire society in the eyes of the protagonist, as Crake describes the inability for their kind to “individualate.. above two hundred [others]… Jimmy would reduce that number to two,” (Atwood 263). The idea that humans only differentiate a certain number of others, typically the amount within their “primal tribe” or society suggests that Oryx and Crake were Jimmy’s entire society, as they are the only ones he can individualize (263). But Crake comes from the name of an extinct animal, as does Oryx. Also the two, who ultimately face death, represent scientific …show more content…

In fact, as the story progresses more and more corporations pop up, each one named after an expectation within society. Most of them are centralized around the idea of escaping age (RejoovenEsense, AnooYoo, NooSkins). The companies feed off of the main ideas the society fabricates: their need for immortality and perfection. Without the ridiculous expectations that society sets, the major corporations within Oryx and Crake would crumble. These corporations have so much money that morals are abandoned, and this occurs in society today as well, not just the dystopian society that Atwood created. One of the scenes that particularly highlights the way major corporations abandon morals when Crake discusses the way that HelthWyzer puts harmful viruses within their vitamins, manufacturing diseases so they profit off of the cure that everyone must now buy (173). What allows HelthWyzer to do this? The societal belief that people are not good enough as they are, and need all these supplements to begin …show more content…

First, there are the people who live within the compounds, which are built by biogenetic companies who have low morals and ethics. These companies represent a more extreme version of the major corporations now, which are willing to abandon morals for profit. Those who live in the compounds work for the companies, constantly creating new drugs and genetically spliced mutations, such as pigoons, which are designed to make profit off of the other portion of the population: those who live in the pleeblands. The pleeblands are crawling with diseases, some of which are manufactured by the compounds to bring in a profit, as the infected population would have to pay for the cure. Those who live in the pleeblands are looked down upon, and are treated as such. Some examples of jobs of ‘pleeblanders’ include sex workers and drug dealers (in the end, though, one could argue the compound companies are simply glorified drug dealers who are no better than those in the Pleeblands). The function of this is once again to relate this dystopian realm, in an extreme manner, to the current one. High end universities and research facilities could be the parallel to Atwood’s compounds, while inner cities where poverty is present could be the parallel of the

Open Document