Comparing Napoleon III And Bismarck

341 Words1 Page

Napoleon III and Bismarck are similar in the way they employed the idea of Realpolitik when making decisions in that they both switched back and forth from liberal to conservative agendas in order to gain more power. After the National Assembly denied him of being able to stand for reelection and revise the Constitution, Napoleon III seized control of the government through the use of troops, showing that he is willing to do whatever it takes to have power. Napoleon III also managed to switch from liberal to conservative ideals depending on which one benefited him. For example, he advocated a legislative body that would be elected by universal male suffrage to appeal to the growing liberalists in France. On the other hand, once he was reelected,

Show More
Related

  • According To Machiavelli: Is Napoleon The Better Leader

    108 Words  | 1 Pages

    According to Machiavelli Napoleon is the better leader. He's the better leader because to Machiavelli you have to use and have the qualities of the fox and the lion. And, Napoleon is menacing, and he is not afraid to use force. Also, Napoleon is like kind of tough. The way the author describes Napoleon it's as if he's not afraid/scared of anything now. Or even then. But he's also very selfish and self centered. Which is a bad thing, because you have to look out and be helpful to other people in order to be a good leader. But Napoleon would still make a better leader according Machiavelli.

    Read More

  • Ap Euro Dbq On Napoleon Bonaparte

    972 Words  | 2 Pages

    Napoleon just maintains the goals of the French Revolution since he needed to secure and reinforce his own energy.

    Read More

  • Bonaparte Betrayed the Revolution

    1622 Words  | 4 Pages

    Napoleon Bonaparte’s attitude towards the French Revolution is one that has often raised questions. That the revolution had an influence on Bonaparte’s regime cannot be denied – but to what extent? When one looks at France after Napoleon’s reign it is clear that he had brought much longed for order and stability. He had also established institutions that embodied the main principles of the revolution. However, it is also evident that many of his policies directly contradict those same principles. Was Napoleon betraying the same revolution that gave him power, or was he merely a pragmatist, who recognised that to consolidate the achievements of the revolution he needed to sacrifice some of those principles?

    Read More

  • Differences And Similarities Between George Washington And Napoleon

    319 Words  | 1 Pages

    While studying George Washington and Napoleon I realized that they had some similarities between them even though they were very different men. Some of the similarities that I found were that they were both military generals that had the same military conduct. They both looked for military glory for social and political advancement. Some of the differences i found were there leadership skills George Washington thought more about the people and what they would need and Napoleon thought about his self and what he wanted. This paper will be talking about George Washington and Napoleon similarities and differences.

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay On Otto Von Bismarck

    753 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the late 1800s, Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck used different strategical plans in order to gain as much power possible, the majority of the plans consisted of him taking advantage of the different political parties. Bismarck used many traditional political strategies in order to gain the power he craved for, such as creating harsh laws and prohibiting certain beliefs or ideas. Unfortunately, these strategies did not satisfy the people, so Bismarck later started to increase the welfare of the working class, apologized to the Socialists, and did much more to obtain more political strength which eventually created a new conservatism. In an effort to increase political power for the Kaiser, Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck uses liberal and traditional

    Read More

  • The last battle of the Bismarck

    1365 Words  | 3 Pages

    The last battle of the Bismarck changed the tides during World War II. The Bismarck was Germany’s most famous battleship during World War Two, and was sunk on May 27, 1941. The Bismarck had already sunk the battleship HMS Hood before being sunk herself. For many, the end of the Hood and Bismarck symbolized the end of the time when battleships were the dominant force in naval warfare, to be replaced by submarines and aircraft carriers and the advantages these ships gave to naval commanders.

    Read More

  • Napoleon Betrayed the Revolution

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    Europe Under Napoleon 1799-1815. Arnold, London, 1996. Ellis, Geoffrey. Profiles in Power: Napoleon, Longman, New York, 1997. Encyclopaedia Britannica, CD Rom, Standard Edition, 1999.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Enlightened Despotism

    752 Words  | 2 Pages

    Enlightened despotism, which is also called enlightened absolutism, was inspired by the enlightenment and is one of the forms of absolute monarchy. Napoleon I who was sometimes called the greatest enlightened despot, what the first figure in politics to use the rhetoric of revolution as well as nationalism, use the military force as back up, and combine all of this into a way of conflicting damage of expanding the empire in the service of power. Napoleon made many changes to the French government, though he was one with absolute power as well as an enlightened despot. There were many policies Napoleon used such as the Constitution of the Year VII, agreeing to a concordat with the Roman Catholic Church, and making peace in both domestic and

    Read More

  • Well Known Practitioners of Realpolitik

    528 Words  | 2 Pages

    Otto Von Bismarck, the most well-known practitioner of Realpolitik, and also the first to coin the term Realpolitik, sought to advance the power and welfare of Prussia. One of the first surprising initiatives taken by Bismarck to achieve stability, and ensure the interest of his country was to integrate the nationalism of the liberals with the views of the Junkers, this ve...

    Read More

  • The Franco-Mexican War

    1026 Words  | 3 Pages

    He wanted to become like his uncle and he took advantage of it. Napoleon III was known to be a very aggressive and power hungry man. Like his uncle, he was very aggressive militarily and tried to gain as much power and land as possible. Meyer & Sherman - "The 'Meyer & Sherman' These aggressive actions have toned down a great deal. not only between France and Mexico but with all countries in the world today.

    Read More

  • Napoleon - an enlightened despot

    1003 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of Napoleon’s first areas of concern was in the strengthening of the French government. He created a strong centralized government and pretty much got rid of the hundreds of localized law codes that had existed during under the control of the monarchy. He also created an army of government officials. He had the entire country linked under a rational administration. He also was able to get an easy supply of taxes and soldiers under his new and improved French government. Before he could get very far, however, he had to gain public favor and shape the public opinion. To do this he used reforms of propaganda and thus caused people to think that they were getting the better end of the deal, but were actually, subconsciously giving Napoleon their approval for his actions. Among some of the methods he used for propaganda included getting all of the printers and book sellers to swear an oath to Napoleon and all newspapers fell under state control, so Napoleon gained access to almost everything that the citizens of France were able to read. Many of the gains from the French Revolution were kept, such as equality before the law, and careers open to talent. Some anti-revolution actions that Napoleon took included repressing liberty, restoring absolutism, and ending political liberty. He believed that allowing political freedom would end with a state of anarchy. He believed that he could solve these problems by acting in favor of the people’s interests as an enlightened desp...

    Read More

  • The Effect Otto Von Bismarck's Leadership and Politics Had on Pre-World War I Tensions in Europe

    1821 Words  | 4 Pages

    The focus of this study is the effect that Otto Von Bismarck's leadership and politics had on Pre-World War One tensions in Europe. This study investigates to what extent the actions of Otto Von Bismarck led to World War One. The focus of this study is the period between Bismarck's appointment to Minister President of Prussia on September 23, 1862 and the Austro-Hungarian declaration of war on Serbia on July 28, 1914. Bismarck's earlier career is discussed briefly but only as a method to understand his political attitudes. And similarly, as Bismarck was removed from office in 1890, the only events discussed between 1890 and 1914 will be based off of policies instilled by Bismarck, not those of Wilhelm II.

    Read More

  • Was Napoleon Bonaparte the Saviour or the Destroyer of the Ideals of the French Revolution?

    1926 Words  | 4 Pages

    With all the glory and the splendour that some countries may have experienced, never has history seen how only only one man, Napoleon, brought up his country, France, from its most tormented status, to the very pinnacle of its height in just a few years time. He was a military hero who won splendid land-based battles, which allowed him to dominate most of the European continent. He was a man with ambition, great self-control and calculation, a great strategist, a genius; whatever it was, he was simply the best. But, even though how great this person was, something about how he governed France still floats among people's minds. Did he abuse his power? Did Napoleon defeat the purpose of the ideals of the French Revolution? After all of his success in his military campaigns, did he gratify the people's needs regarding their ideals on the French Revolution? This is one of the many controversies that we have to deal with when studying Napoleon and the French Revolution. In this essay, I will discuss my opinion on whether or not was he a destroyer of the ideals of the French Revolution.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Tirpitz And Bismarck

    962 Words  | 2 Pages

    Bismarck and Tirpitz During World War II the Germans designed the Bismarck class battleship, which could destroy or cripple any British warship in a one on one engagement. However, after surviving multiple attacks by surface ships the ship was hit by an air launched torpedo. The torpedo struck the ship by the rudder, which jammed it and left the nearly invincible ship sailing in circles. After the air attack every British ship in the area swarmed the Bismarck, and eventually sunk the ship, which was unable to maneuver away. The second ship of the Bismarck class to be completed was the Tirpitz.

    Read More

  • Napoleon: Hero or Tyrant?

    1475 Words  | 3 Pages

    Napoleon Bonaparte was an interesting ruler in that he was compromised of attributes of both a tyrant and a hero. Napoleon had a strong following throughout his reign and even during his two exiles. He was the emperor of France between 1799 and 1815, following the fall of the Directory. Despite the efforts of the French Revolution to rid the country of an autocratic ruler, Bonaparte came to power as Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte I in 1804. He claimed that he preserved the goals of the Revolution, which can be easily argued as his rule became more dictatorial as it progressed. Despite his departure from some of the gains of the Revolution, he overall was a hero for the French people. Through his military ventures, political changes and social reform, Napoleon proved himself as a hero. This is not to say that there were aspects of his reign that were tyrannical, but he was overall beneficial for France.

    Read More

More about Comparing Napoleon III And Bismarck

Open Document