Comparing Murder In The Dark And The Handmaid's Tale

659 Words2 Pages

Readers often find themselves trying to correlate the works they read to their respective authors, even when those works are fictitious. The need to find a human connection pushes readers to draw conclusions on who the author is based on their stories. Catherine Bush believes that this “autobiographical reading” takes away from the experience of the book and puts the author in a box they don't belong in. It is wrong to assume that the author has a direct personal link to their fictional creation, unless indicated by the author themself. It makes sense though to assume the story does reveal their ideologies and viewpoints. This is seen in Margaret Atwood’s works Murder in the Dark and The Handmaid’s tale, in both works there are messages to be found that
Murder in the Dark is a collection of short fiction by Canadian author Margaret …show more content…

One of the short stories is about a game called murder in the dark where out of a group a murderer and a detective are chosen. The role of the murderer is to kill (and lie when asked if they did it) in the dark without being caught by the detective when the lights go back on. A reader has no grounds to make a link between the game and Atwood’s life. It is impossible to know whether she really plays this game; it is more likely that she is using this fictitious account to relay a message. Near the end of the story Atwood sets a scenario where the murderer is the writer, the detective is the reader, and the victim is the book. In another scenario the author is the murderer, a critic is the detective, and the reader is the victim. Applying this directly to her life would mean she was a murderer, which wouldn't make sense because she would

Open Document