Comparing Malcolm X And Martin Luther King Jr.

843 Words2 Pages

Segregation was something all around United States, and Martin Luther King Jr with along Malcolm X had their hearts into changing how people of color were being treated although, they had their different ways of establishing the Civil Rights Movement. In the 1960s the Emancipation Proclamation had set many African Americans free but, some were not free from racism. Many of white people had trouble accepting African Americans were able to live their lives as they pleased. Most of all segregation took place in the South were big cites were established. One of the big cities that had an issue with racism was Birmingham, Alabama. Martin Luther King Jr wrote a testimony wanting to reach the people that were controlling the way things were being …show more content…

Martin, in my eyes was really wise and new what he was doing. I felt that he had studied the ways of knowing what route to take and knew the knowledge of how to go between the laws. Mr. King has more of a compassion in his testimony than Malcolm X. Martin gives us more of a description of how colored people are feeling, and really tries to make us understand how they are reacting. Martin wants equal rights and is willing to fight for it without violence and I agree that is the right way to approach it because violence will bring more pain to the color people than what they already have. In the 1960s the Civil Rights Movement was greatly impact by many colored people to do the right thing. If it was speaking their minds such as Rosa Parkers sitting in the front of the bus and standing her ground or such as Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X leading people to make their standing of what is right. Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X had different approaches of establishing the Civil Rights Movement, but both had the same idea of how things would end up for the colored people which was peace and

Open Document