Comparing Humphrey Bogart In To Have And Have Not And Casablanca

1395 Words3 Pages

Humphrey Bogart is recognized as one of the most iconic actors of the 1940s, as he appeared in several major and successful films throughout this decade. In contrast to his many different roles in film, Bogart was raised in an upper-middle-class family and went on to serve in the navy during World War I. Following the war, Bogart began his acting career in the early 1920s, eventually leading him to be featured as the protagonist in films such as To Have and Have Not and Casablanca. Bogart’s ability to assume the roles of both sensitive, “good guy” characters and greedy, manipulating characters supports the opinion that Bogart was one of the best, if not the top actor of the 1940s. While To Have and Have Not and Casablanca each contain differentiating plots, Bogart is the most influential and prominent character throughout both. In his article, Midsection Bogart, Richard Schickel states that within his roles, especially in Casablanca, Bogart seems, …show more content…

In each film, there are certain points in which Bogart’s role has a clear transformation in personality and a new basis behind his actions. These pivotal points are crucial to notice as a member of the audience and are the initial moments in which the viewer is able to understand and follow the reasons for Bogart’s individual actions. In both of these specific cases, the transformation and change begins directly after the introduction of a female character to the film’s plot.
In his article, “A Second Look: Casablanca,” Lenny Rubenstein notices that,
Rick’s disillusionment with politics…is linked to his bitterness over the dismal end to his Parisian affair with Ilsa Lund, played by Ingrid bergman, on the event of the German entrance to the city. Then while Sam plays it, the famous Parisian flashback, complete with skillfully interwoven scenes of the German invasion,

Open Document