Compare And Contrast The Underground Man By Dostoevsky

320 Words1 Page

Dostoevsky’s narrator points out that while the “direct” people have certain, desirable qualities, they lack the advantages that accompany one with a conscious mind. The direct person, what the Underground Man refers to as, “the real normal man,” can act on instinct and perform an act of revenge or some other action without contemplating the implications. As such, the “direct” person is stupid according to the Underground man. However, he states there is beauty in this stupidity. A sort of, “ignorance is bliss.” The Underground Man then contrasts the direct person to its antithesis. This antithetical individual is like the Underground Man. This person is completely incapable of performing an act of revenge or any other kind of action

Open Document