Comparing Anabaptism And Calvin's Role In The Protestant Reformation

987 Words2 Pages

There were many Christian approaches in the Protestant Reformation in the sixteenth century, many of which approached the views of social thought. Protestantism, which opposing Roman Catholicism, came to the forefront and marked a significant conversion in the Christian world. The Protestant religion, enforced by such theologians as Zwingli, Luther and Calvin, was growing in rapidity, and the power that the Roman Catholic Church possessed was falling. Protestantism was rapidly gaining strength. Because of this action, two very different branches emerged to help and support the Christian religion and theological traditions. The two of them are Calvinism and Anabaptists. Both of these reformed movements tried to spread the gospel and to renew …show more content…

Calvin was very inspired by Luther and inspired by his spiritual development. Although Calvin did believe in Predestination like Luther did, he went a realm further and adds a strong accent on the predestination and the glory of God believed that God has the will and power to choose who is saved but also who is dammed and is destruction. The system of Calvinism follows to a very high view of scripture and seeks to gain its theological creations based solely on God’s word. It focuses on God’s sovereignty, stating that God is able and willing by virtue of his knowledge, to do whatever He desires with His creation. Because of this, Calvin’s doctrine of the church evidences his opposition to the Anabaptists. From the book Calvin and the Anabaptist Radicals, written by Willem Balke, its quoted that “Countering their spiritualism and subjectivism, he declares that the church cannot be completely holy in this age, that there must be order in the church as well as in the office of the minister of the Word.”(48-49) Also in the book Calvin states, “ But all Gods elect are so united and conjoined in Christ…that, as they are dependent on the Head, they also grow together into one body, being joined and knit together… as are the limbs of one body…”(49) In Calvin’s mind, the church is defined as a universal communion, one body where the church should not be split …show more content…

They wanted a strict separation of church and state, for the purity of the church and for the protection of the church from discrimination by the state. This was carried to such an extreme that they were completely against violence, opposed to all military service, and took no oaths and held no government offices. One thing the Anabaptists had was the Schleitheim Confession, which held what was the Anabaptists principle. It consisted of seven articles that define what the Anabaptists believed to be true. In the book The Theology of Anabaptism by Robert Friedmann, it talks about the confession and about “man is simultaneously righteous and sinner.” What Anabaptists have to say about that is in the third confession they quote “We cannot be partakers at the same time of the table of the Lord and the table of devils. Nor can we at the same time partake and drink of the cup of the Lord and the cup of devils. That is: all those who have fellowship with the dead works of darkness have no part in the light. Thus all those who follow the devil and the world, have no part with those who have been called out of the world unto God. All those who lie in evil have no part in the

More about Comparing Anabaptism And Calvin's Role In The Protestant Reformation

Open Document