Comparing A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings And A Hunger Artist

1809 Words4 Pages

An English novelist and poet, Thomas Hardy, called patience a “blending of moral courage with physical timidity.” To have the capacity or willingness to wait and to endure is a vital human virtue that is becoming rare in this restless world. The unique protagonists of Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s “A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings” and Franz Kafka’s “A Hunger Artist” manifest attributes of patience, tolerance, and self-control in the face of suffering for people’s entertainment. Both the authors depict true human nature in regard to the relationship between the protagonists and the insensitive world around them. Moreover, the effects of realistic characterization as well as mythical allusions highlight the struggles facing these individuals who …show more content…

Both also never choose to leave their cage, although the hunger artist is free to do so when he pleases. The angel comes off at first as a threat and a freak of nature simply because he appeared out of nowhere and he does not posses the grandeur that the people imagine an angel should have. The villagers treat him not as “a supernatural creature but a circus animal” in a manner that is disrespectful, ignorant, and inhumane. For instance, they torture the old man by locking him up in a chicken coop, tossing him food “without the slightest reverence” (145), pelting him with stones, and even burning his side “with an iron for branding steers” (147). The angel has become a spectacle and is paraded for profit before the crowds. Everyone, especially Pelayo and Elisenda, benefits from the angel’s passive endurance. Amidst the bustle and the exploitation, the angel takes “no part in his own act,” keeping to himself and remaining indifferent to the villagers’ taunts. He tolerates the abuses with “the patience of a dog who had no illusions” (149) and stays aloof from various visitors, who upon hearing news of his existence flock to seek healing or see him perform miracles. He demonstrates incredible patience under such harsh circumstances, though “his only supernatural virtue” (147) does not make much of an impression to the people; instead, they take …show more content…

He is also the subject of others’ suspicion, and he distances himself from people. Neither the angel nor the hunger artist seem to have any desire to communicate with their visitors, such that the hunger artist does not respond to any of the attention that the onlookers give him; instead, the hunger artist sits in his cage, “withdrawing deep into himself, paying no attention to anyone or anything” and “sometimes giving a courteous nod, answering questions with a constrained smile, or perhaps stretching an arm through the bars” (219). Even at the pinnacle of his career, the hunger artist still feels underappreciated by his spectators. The hunger artist’s audience is not at all interested in his art of fasting so much as it fascinates them of his suffering. Rather than respecting the hunger artist for his self-control and integrity, the public trivializes his artistic endeavor. Since the hunger artist holds his fasting in high regard, he grows especially frustrated with the “permanent watchers” who do not take their duties earnestly “because they made him feel miserable; they made his fast seem unendurable” (220). Furthermore, the hunger artist depends on the constant support and praise of his spectators to make it through life and above all, the merits of his art understood. Sadly, towards the end, visitors pass his cage with hardly a glance at

Open Document