Compare The Manifesto Of The Renaissance And Reformation

723 Words2 Pages

The Renaissance and Reformation was a time of rejuvenation. It was an age filled with art, philosophical and literary phenomenons. Among them are the master of sculptures and a plethora of paintings, Michelangelo, and the most famous philosophical teacher of the time, Pico Della Mirandola, who wrote what has been called 'the manifesto of the renaissance'. For Christianity's sake, the most important is Martin Luther, who wrote a letter to Pope Leo X, calling out the moral corruption of the church and the wrongdoings and how they are saved by faith alone. The letter basically says: while I've attacked the church I've never necessarily attacked you. But, if you want an attack I can give you one. In fact, here is why I am right and you're wrong. He develops his argument by citing scripture: Romans 3:10-12 and John 6:27. He states that a Christian becomes righteous, not by anything to do with the flesh, but by faith; by accepting Jesus. Luther's beliefs are that good works do not make a good person but a good person does good works. Works aren't done for ourselves, but to show God and others our love. …show more content…

He mentions the inner and outer beings of a person. The inner is referring to a new spirit, meanwhile the outer is speaking about an old man, which is the flesh nature of person. “We first approach the subject of the inward man, that we may see by what means a man becomes justified, free, and a true Christian; that is, a spiritual, new, and inward man.” The basis of his concept is stated thus: “A Christian man is the most free lord of all, and subject to none; a Christian man is the most dutiful servant of all, and subject to every one.” [104] He then refers to the Bible to make sure , Leo X , so he can draw true ratiocination as to what he is saying “'Though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all' (1 Cor. ix. 19)

Open Document