2. Introduction
The focus of this report will be The Battle of Hastings and William the Conqueror who lead the Normans into the Battle of Hastings. It will become clear to see that the Battle of Hastings was ‘The battle that changed history’ (Simon Newman, 2013: Online).
3. William the Conqueror
William the Conqueror (figure 1) was born in Falaise, Normandy, France in 1028. His parents were Robert I, Duke of Normandy and Arlette, Daughter of Fullbert. When William was eight, His father Robert I, Duke of Normandy, died in 1035 while returning from a pilgrimage to Jerusalem and William was promoted to the duke of Normandy. That was a bad idea. Violence and corruption plagued his early reign. A few of Williams’s guards died and even his school teacher, but with the help of King Henry I of France, he managed to survive the early years. He was knighted by the King in 1042, although he was just 14. By 1064, William had conquered and won
…show more content…
King William who was furious about the betrayal, decided to invade England to claim the English throne. On September, 1066 William landed in Pevensey, England with around 5,000 troops and 2,000 cavalry. After seizing Pevensey, William marched onto Hastings. On October 13th, 1066 William finished organizing his forces and King Harold II arrived near Hastings with his army of 5,000-7,000 troops and cavalry. The battle was fought the next day on Senlac hill (Figure 4), England. Harold got shot in the eye, according to the legend and his two brothers were killed. Around 10,000 troops were killed in the battle of Hastings. King Harold’s forces were obliterated by William’s well trained troops (Figure 5). After the victory, William the Conqueror was marched into London. He received the city’s submission and was crowned the first Norman king of England and proved to be a good king. Harold’s death brought the end to the Anglo-Saxon phase of English
He was born in Baltimore in 1748, but his story begins long before his birth. It started when his father’s family immigrated to Pennsylvania in 1680’s. His father just so happened to move to Maryland, where he met his wife, married her, and settled in Baltimore where William was to be born. William had many hard times and little schooling until he was ten, when his family moved to North Carolina.
“BritishBattles.Com Analysing and Documenting British Battles from the Previous Centuries.” BritishBattlescom. Web. 24 Nov. 2015.
October 14th of the year 1066 two armies faced each other near the town of Hastings. 10,000 Norman troops under the command of William of Normandy faced 8,000 Anglo-Saxon soldiers led by Harold the current king of England.
with the intent of widespread entertainment, elements of comedy and other aspects of entertaining film can, at times, cloud the message and content of the documentary. An anti-war advocate, Terry Jones’ presentation of matter so closely related to strong personal sentiments can also introduce a degree of bias in the presentation and approach taken to analyzing the events detailed in the series. However, the documentary incorporates the input and analysis of several highly-regarded medieval historians, including Jonathan Riley-Smith, Suheil Zakkar, Fikret Isiltan, David Lazenby, and Christopher Tyerman. This group of historians, all highly esteemed individuals in the field, are able to offer a balanced and likely unbiased account of what they believe to be true about the
Columbia University, Press. "Battle Of Britain." Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6Th Edition (2013): 1. History Reference Center. Web. 2 May 2014.
William, I was born in 1028 and was the illegitimate child of the Duke of Normandy, Robert I and a local tanner. He spent most of his life in battle and in hiding from the hazard of rebel attacks he used Henry I of France's help to survive and attain jurisdiction and regulation. William the Conqueror introduced new languages, laws, defenses, and cultures into Medieval England thus creating the way that modern society
William the Conqueror and his Patronage William I, better known as William the Conqueror, began his medieval and political career at a young age when his father left him to go on a crusade. Effectively William became the Duke of Normandy. He had to fight against other members of the Norman royalty who desired William's land and treasure. William learned at an early age that the men who ruled Europe during the middle ages were primarily interested in their own greed at the expense of all else, including the concepts chivalry and honor. He soon became a feared military commander, conquering all in Normandy who would oppose his interests.
William served faithfully under three kings and served as regent for a fourth. His loyalty and honor never hesitated and were never compromised. His oaths of fealty and innate sense of honor governed and directed his entire life. Because of his commitments, William Marshall will remain the most outstanding knight of the Middle Ages.
While the Anglo Saxons are the soldiers on foot holding axes and creating a shielded wall to brace impact. Using textual evidence and comparing it to the tapestry a medievalist can not only distinguish the two sides, but also learn what people in medieval times believed to be a beneficial way to explain significant events in their
1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.
Polydore Vergil provides a valuable account of the Battle of Bosworth including the reasons why Henry Tudor won. As well as this, the issues Henry Tudor faced as he tried to secure his throne afterwards can be drawn reliably from the source. Also, although Vergil wasn’t in England during the time of the Battle of Bosworth, he did research the topic carefully so his account may be taken as being factually correct. However, it is important to remember that the nature of the source may be a pro-Tudor propaganda as Vergil was appointed by Henry Tudor to write about his reign. Because of this, the source may not be taken at face value.
After our study of many accounts of the English Civil War and Charles I’s trial and execution, it is clear that discovering historical truth and writing a satisfying history are two very separate, difficult tasks, and that finding among many accounts a single “best” story is complex, if not impossible. In order to compare the job each historian did in explaining what’s important about this conflict, the following criteria can be helpful for identifying a satisfying history.
though he was king he had to convince people that he was the true and
William had a youth of clean life and of much natural piety, while the years of storm and stress through which he passed gave him an endurance of character which lasted to his life's end. During the time of anarchy in Normandy he became a skilled military leader and defeated his enemies, uniting his duchy. Once he began fighting, rumor has it that he never lost a battle. In 1047 a serious rebellion of nobles occurred, and William with the aid of King Henry of France, gained a great victory at Val-ès-Dunes, near Caen.
Anonymous, “Why did William win the Battle of Hastings?”, Answers Co-operation, [Accessed on the 1st July, 2010]