Compare Oedipus The King And Death Of A Salesman

1029 Words3 Pages

A Tragic Destiny
Tragedies depict catastrophic storylines that tug and pull at one’s heart. They leave us with lessons for own lifetimes and give us glimpses of our pasts. That is to say, death is witnessed by many in this world making it one of the most widely relatable concepts. Evidently, that is why most think that what comprise tragedies are deaths. Death occurs in both Sophocles’ Oedipus the King and Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman and yet in each play the author portrays a different understanding of a tragic hero. Miller’s Willy Loman is a failing salesman who’s past and longtime aspirations haunt his mind. Eventually, these flawed expectations drive Loman to his downfall. Whereas, Oedipus’ hubris and pre-determined destiny cause
Willy’s own paranoia about life stems mostly from his unacceptance of his older son, Biff, as seen when Willy is speaking to him, “Not finding yourself at the age of thirty-four is a disgrace!”(Loman 16) Willy imagined his son to be a huge success in the sales business but much to his obvious dislike that never happened. The main character continues to push his son to become what he envisions and refuses to embrace his son for who he really is. Willy’s familial relationships would be better if he surpasses his prideful stereotype of who he thinks his son, Biff, should live up to be. Another example of Willy Loman’s unwillingness to change his ways is declining Charley’s offers to employ him, “I got a job, I told you that” (Loman 43). Willy’s own dream of supporting his family is selfishly getting in the way of what is truly happening: his job is not keeping his family out of financial crisis. Willy’s refusal to take Charley’s job offers only bury him deeper in the hole and goes to prove his obstinate determination in achieving his dreams despite his current situation. For these reasons, Willy is not as much of a tragic hero as Oedipus because he has the opportunity to change and prevent his own

Open Document