Compare Dulce Et Decorum Est And Anthem For Doomed Youth

943 Words2 Pages

Wilfred Owen has composed many poems based on his intense personal experience as a soldier and wrote with both physical and moral trauma of the World War I. Particularly, two of his poems, “Dulce et Decorum Est” and “Anthem for Doomed Youth”, portray the misery that the soldiers have to suffer. Owen is not just delivering the meaning of poem using the suggestive words but also embroidering both poems with potent auditory qualities such as tone, alliteration, and sound devices. The poet actively promotes the audience’s the auditory sense to create much more distinct and detailed horrors of war. In “Dulce et Decorum est”, Owen brings the horrors and pity of being a combatant for the public to understand not just literarily but through stimulating the audience’s auditory sense. From the outset, the poet narrates in a traumatic tone. Regardless of any interpretation, the opening is not pleasant: “coughing like hags,” and “cursed through the sludge,” (Owen line 2). The sounds of beldams’ cough and curse illustrate the …show more content…

The poet raises scepticism about the young men going to the war as he did in “Dulce et Decorum Est”. Although the tone is quite different from previous poem, the message that the poet is conveying is in the same manner. While “Dulce et Decorum est” has unfolded the traumatic mood, “Anthem for Doomed Youth” spools out cynical tone in the solemn nature. Owen expresses his pessimistic view about death in war that those who sacrifice in war do not receive the holistic rituals. The poet introduces a number of ritual symbols that embrace the deceased with the sacred sounds. Nonetheless, the dead soldiers are greeted neither with “passing-bells” nor “prayers” but with “the monstrous anger of the guns” and “The Shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells;” (Owen line 2, 7). The audience, as well as the poet, bitterly admits that the heinous sounds of artillery are the “Anthem for Doomed

Open Document