Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
John smith revisited
Comprtive essay on john smith
Comprtive essay on john smith
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
History takes place so rapidly that it’s often hard to recall the exact occurrence without technology. Most of our primary sources come from the writing of an individual as they experience history unfolding. It’s rare that two individuals provide stories so similar that they can be compared. John Smith and William Bradford provide this rare opportunity with their renderings. Comparing and contrasting the writing of the two allows the purpose, intended audience and more to be identified.
Smith’s purpose was to convince more people to move to the new land without fear. John smith described modern paradises in hopes that people would be convinced to join the settlers of the new land. Smith explicitly states “My purpose is not to persuade children from their parents;
…show more content…
William Bradford made sure to include religion as a major part of his journals. This proves the purpose was more than a simple description. Instead, Bradford intended to provide the writings as a manual for others to use for survival. After reading the work, readers are given a sense of how to survive in the new land.
With John Smith’s renderings came a couple of promises. Smith offered leadership primarily. Anyone willing to follow him to the new land would have his guiding hand. John Smith also promised shelter to the new settlers. His final promise was to fulfill their needs. Each promise is summarized in the statement that promises “sufficient power to command them, houses to receive them, means to defend them and meet provisions for them.” (Baym) At some point William Bradford and John Smith crossed paths. William Bradford describes John Smith as a “man of able gifts” and “good preacher.” (Baym) He even goes on to state that Smith became a pastor at one point. This follows the promise John Smith made to stay with those that accompanied him. The captain not only stayed, but also became a man of the
“So many therefore of these professors as saw the evil of these things, in these parts, and whose hearts the Lord had touched with heavenly zeal for his truth, they shook off this yoke of anti-Christian bondage..” (123). Also, even though the leaders of the colony of Jamestown and Plymouth were both Englishmen, they had different goals. William Bradford was dedicated to his cause of finding a safe haven where they could find religious freedom, while John Smith was more interested in finding land, natural resources for his
People’s main motives were not religious, but to “dig gold, wash gold, refine gold, load gold,”(Doc F). This resulted in competition, rather than bonding, over the settlement. The economy of the Chesapeake region made it more profitable to spread out, making the development of cities, schools, and churches more difficult. When the Joint Stock Co landed at Jamestown, they were looking for gold. Even though no gold appeared, John Rolfe’s founding of tobacco (Doc F) as a cash crop, and Virginia’s headright system, ensured people would continue to mold the Chesapeake and leave behind a mercantilist environment. The Chesapeake drew mostly single men, who came for individual profit, and indentured servants (Doc C). The economic gap between rich and poor was much larger, especially after the introduction of slaves and indentured servants, in the Chesapeake region than in New England. The Articles of Agreement shown in (Doc D) stated a common goal of “everyone’s quality and estate.” As they developed a much tighter community, they were more invested in the prosperity of everyone in their community. (Doc E) says that laborers “consider the religious end of their callings,” this shows that there was a religious motive to serve God by striving to maintain the strength of their
Edward, Rebecca and Henretta, James and Self, Robert. America A Concise History. 5th ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 2012.
These advocates expected the Native Americans to leave their lands voluntarily. With the promise for land west of the Mississippi there would be no limits to the tribe’s choice of government, assistance, relocation and protection. Jefferson believed that the Indians’ failures were theirs to own and they needed to depend on themselves alone to become numerous and great people. He encouraged them to take the new land and cultivate it, build a home, and leave it to his children. He was failing to tell them that they really didn’t have much of a choice. Boudinot determined that many of the Cherokee people would leave their land if the true state of their condition was made known to them. They were left with only two real alternatives, one to live under the white man’s law or to be forcibly removed to another country. However some American’s worried about the future of the Native Americans. John Ross’s letter to president Jackson believed it was the white man’s duty to relieve the Indians from their suffering. This could only be accomplished by allowing the Native Americans to obtain their land in Georgia under the rights and privileges as free men. Nevertheless no great lands good for farming would be given to the Native Americans and Jackson would sign the Indian removal act. This act would allow the government to exchange fertile land for land in the west, where they would forcibly relocate the Indian
In the early nineteenth century, most Northerners and Southerners agreed entirely that Americans should settle Western territories, and that it was God’s plan, or their “manifest destiny.” Northerners and Southerners who moved west were in search of a better life and personal economic gain; were they had failed before in the east, they believed they would do better in the west. The Panic of 1837 was a motivation to head
Compare and Contrast A Description of New England and A Model of Christian Charity Mankind can be conceived in interesting ways by analyzing the writings of John Smith and John Winthrop. As I read through John Smith‘s “A Description of New England” and John Winthrop’s “A Model of Christian Charity,” it became evident to me that the two readings had similar and different viewpoints of the essential nature of man. Throughout my paper, I will compare their similar beliefs of community and diversity of people and completely contrast their ideas of emphasis on religion and relationships with enemies. Both authors stress a sense of community and diversity in order to survive in America.
By referring closely to J B Priestley’s account of Bradford, explain what he considers gave the city its particular character at the time he was writing. J.B. Priestley, in his writing about Bradford, believes its character comes from, what might seem like, conflicting ideas. These ideas contribute to what Priestley calls Bradford’s odd quality. The character of Bradford, in 1933, when Priestley was writing, was made up of two extremes, provincialism and that of a cosmopolitan city. Provincialism remained in Bradford, firstly because the railway went to Leeds and not to Bradford and therefore the city didn’t get much new trade, such as any other manufacturing and/or greater educational opportunities.
William Bradford and John Smith’s two pieces both convey America as a place to escape the European world but completely fail to contain congruency on what early America was like in this time period.
Religion was the foundation of the early Colonial American Puritan writings. Many of the early settlements were comprised of men and women who fled Europe in the face of persecution to come to a new land and worship according to their own will. Their beliefs were stalwartly rooted in the fact that God should be involved with all facets of their lives and constantly worshiped. These Puritans writings focused on their religious foundations related to their exodus from Europe and religions role in their life on the new continent. Their literature helped to proselytize the message of God and focused on hard work and strict adherence to religious principles, thus avoiding eternal damnation. These main themes are evident in the writings of Jonathan Edwards, Cotton Mathers, and John Winthrop. This paper will explore the writings of these three men and how their religious views shaped their literary works, styles, and their historical and political views.
The colonists who first arrived in America came to this land because they saw an opportunity to regenerate their religion and to live according to it without subjugation. The immense size of the land sugge...
The quest for truth and Justice, for social and economic equality. A place where everyone had a fair change at making it big. America! America! The land of the FREE and the home of the brave, set your sail and travel to the New World of wonder and where your wildest dreams come true. Through the eyes of Peter Noyes you can see a drastic change in America. Within his lifetime the American Dream became real, and the ways of life became a lot better. When Peter left England he left an entire system of rules and regulations unknown to the settlers in the New World. And then there was a change in the New World almost to what we think of as America today. In the 1630's in Weyhill, England there was a firm set of beliefs and regulations in place. Life was how it was, and that was that. There was no changing it, so you might as well not try. First, government existed through the manorial system. It was a rural setting where farming was the way of life. At each manor there was a lord, and many serfs. Everything was communal. The property, which the serfs lived on, was communally shared using an open field farming system. Each person had their crops in rows, intermingled with rows of their neighbors crops. All of the cows were grazed together in one place, and all of the sheep grazed together in another place. Each farmer had the right to cut hay from the community field to feed his stock for the winter. The tools that the people used, such as plows, belonged to the lord. In exchange for use of the lord's land and tools the serfs paid a tax, and maintained all of the lord's grounds. The amount of land you had determined your social class, which was based on birthright. The king, of course was on top of everyone else. Next came the nobleman, such as landlords, after them came the Bourgeoisie who had a fair amount of $, and lastly came the peasants. There was no social mobility, you were who you were and there was no changing that. Your wealth was the same as your social status. The king, who collected the taxes, had money, and therefore power, so he was on top. Then came the rich landowner, and then all of the tenants.
For years the people of America had used economic gain as a reason to push west into territory that was both uncharted and fought over. (Acuna 255-256). However the religious revival, as well as O'sullivan's term, Manifest destiny breathed new purpose into the march westward. God himself had chosen Americans to hold the great responsibility of controlling all of the land from the west coast of America to the east coast and it was the people's destiny to spread out in conquest. Along with this destiny came the divine mission to spread the democratic ideals of the nation to those who did not have it, to civilize and make free the people who held the land of America long before the pilgrims reached the shores of North America. Though pushed by an increase in technology and the market economy many defended that the ideals of Manifest Destiny had nothing to do with the desire for wealth at all, but that they only expanded westward because God had chosen them to. (Foote 478-479). In John L. O'sullivan's article The Greatest Good of the Greatest Number he defends America's rights, writing "We feel safe under the banner of the democratic principle, which is borne onward by an unseen hand of providence, to lead our race toward the high destinies of which every human soul contains the
Rice does a stupendous job of briefly and easily reinterpreting and breaking down a time of revolution, rebellion, and transformation within colonial America. Though short and sweeping, his intriguing work should not go unnoticed for he recreates a crucial event in history into something much more exciting than ever before for his audience. Rice ties this rebellion to other revolutions that would follow such as the Glorious Revolution in Maryland arguing that there is a link between this revolt in 1676 and the many others than would eventually follow. Rice’s narrative is one that is extremely unique. His ability to affectively grasp his readers attention on subjects of history such as Bacon’s Rebellion, that have been previously over looked due to their blandness, is truly remarkable. Despite his inability to give an in-depth analysis on each event that occurred, making the subject interesting and reasonable to read and understand is more important for the success of the narrative. Though some claims within the book could probably use further elaboration for his audience, James D. Rice’s Tales from a Revolution is a well-written book that is able to convey in a concise manner, accurate information regarding an extremely important event in history for a wide array of audiences using what can be considered a new-age style of
Fichtelberg, J. (2004). The Colonial Stage: Risk and Promise in John Smith's Virginia. Early American Literature, 39(1), 11.
In “ A Description of New England ”, Smith starts by describing the pleasure and content that risking your life for getting your own piece of land brings to men. On the other hand, Bradford reminds us how harsh and difficult the trip to the New World was for the p...