Compare And Contrast The Thirteen Colonies

687 Words2 Pages

The Thirteen Colonies’ economy were driven by many different things. The North was all about fish, the Middle was pretty much just crops, although it had lots of industry. lastly there was the South which was all about crops and plantations. The economy was like this mainly because of the geography and temperature. If that was different, then different thing would drive the economic structure. The South's economy was driven by crops and plantations. It was like this because of the geography. They had hot, humid summers and their soil was nice and fertile. This caused their farms to be nice and large. They also needed many slaves to help out with their plantations. The first slaves arrived in the colonies in Jamestown, 1619. The average southern …show more content…

They hunted animals to put food on the table, as well as make furs. They also had forests to chop down for lumber, because England had a shortage, also for shipbuilding and housebuilding. Artisans, shopkeepers, and merchants all provided services for farmers. You could also usually find furniture makers, wheelwrights, and blacksmiths, in villages. Unlike in the south, there was no slaves, except for a little bit when they were first introduced to the colonies. Although there were no slaves, there were lots of immigrants. They came because if they lived in the south they would have to back breaking work all day in the hot sun. This provided lots of labor in the New England colonies, from working in bait shops to actual fishing. The New England colonies Geography was different from the middle, and southern colonies. Sure they had plains and lowland, but all they had hard, rocky soil. During the last ice age, glaciers had moved all the rich, fertile soil down south. Not only was the rocky soil making it hard to farm, but there was also hills and forests that got in the way as well; lastly, they had long cold winters, with humid summers, and the growing season was only five months

Open Document