Compare And Contrast The Spanish Conquistadors

618 Words2 Pages

In 1492, on a search for an Atlantic route to the West Indies, the explorer Christopher Columbus became the first European to set foot in the Americas after disembarking on the island of Hispaniola. The Spanish, who had financed Columbus’s voyage, wasted little time in sending men to settle and explore the newly discovered land. However, the Spanish settlers were not alone; the Americas were already inhabited by indigenous peoples living in complex societies. The Spanish arrival in the Americas led to the collapse of the great Mesoamerican and Andean civilizations and the mass subjugation of the Amerindian population. The exchange of religion, goods, livestock, and disease between the Spanish and indigenous tribes further transformed Native American societies. …show more content…

First, in 1521, Hernán Cortés and a small Spanish army captured the Aztec emperor along with the empire’s capital city of Tenochtitlan. Later, in 1533, another conquistador, Francisco Pizarro, executed the Incan emperor and plundered the Incan capital of Cuzco. The Spaniards’ gunpowder weapons and steel armor easily outmatched the more primitive weaponry of the indigenous Americans, who had a very limited knowledge of metallurgy. Furthermore, after taking decisive control of much of the Americas, the Spanish Crown brought over Iberian legal codes and established a bureaucratic empire, appointing officials and instituting courts. Finally, under the encomienda system, the Crown granted conquistadors large tracts of land and a number of Native American laborers, who were forced to work in plantations or mines. Under Spanish governance, indigenous groups lost a large degree of

Open Document