Compare And Contrast The Sniper And I R A Sniper

918 Words2 Pages

What could a person do to make people consider them as dangerous? I don't really do anything dangerous. I may not relate to this but I do understand what and how dangerous things can be. The type of danger a person could cause is harm to others and their families and affects their lives. The I.R.A sniper from The Sniper and Rixon from Crescendo share the same character trait which is being dangerous,because they harm and murder people. In Crescendo Rixon is a fallen angel. Rixon wants to become human and in order to do that he needs to kill his vessel or a direct descendant from that person's bloodline but they also have to be a nephilim. For instance her is an example,Rixon slipped the gun out from under his shirt to motion nora deeper into the fun house. Keep walking. Where are we going. He didn't answer. The police are on there way. Hang the police, Rixon said. I'll be finished before they get here (Fitzpatrick 395). First this proves that Rixon is dangerous because he has a gun and is intending on using it on nora. Secondly he said hang the police which is not really a good sign that he care if they are coming or not. Also for my second piece of evidence it …show more content…

The IRA Sniper wasn't the only one their. He now has to find a way out without anyone seeing him. He wanted to fire, but he knew it was useless. His bullets would never pierce the steel that covered the gray monster (O’Flaherty 2). This is an example of him being dangerous by showing that he has a gun and has every intention of using but he knew it wouldn't work. His hand trembled in eagerness, pressing his lips together, he took a deep breath through his nostrils and fired (O’Flaherty 4). This is another piece of evidence that shows he is dangerous. Even when he is injured he still kills his target and finds his way to escape. This connects to the thesis because it shows that he killed someone. He killed another human to

Open Document