Compare And Contrast The Hamilton And Zuk Model For Parasite-Mediated Sexual Selection

993 Words2 Pages

Hamilton and Zuk (1982) proposed a model for parasite- mediated sexual selection in which females’ base mating choice on variable male traits, using the degree of expression of these traits as an indicator of heritable parasite resistance. This hypothesis is currently one of the dominant frameworks used to explain the relationship between parasites and the sexual selection of its host. Hamilton and Zuk’s hypothesis predicts that parasite intensity will be inversely correlated to both mating success and degree of expression of traits for males (Hamilton and Zuk 1982). While there is a significant amount of support for this hypothesis and prediction from empirical studies, there is roughly an equal amount of studies that report finding no relationship …show more content…

One assumption of the Hamilton- Zuk hypothesis is that full expression of secondary sexual characteristics in the host is limited due to parasitic infection (Hamilton and Zuk 1982). This assumption is meet under certain host- parasite systems, but failure to recognize the lack of generality that applies to this hypothesis could lead to experiments on inappropriate systems (Howard and Minchella 1990). Considering factors such as parasite life cycle and mode of transmission, it is clear that is assumption would likely not be meet by several parasite systems. If the studied host is acting as an intermediate host or the studied parasite is sexually transmitted it would not benefit the parasite to decrease mating success of the host by limiting expression of certain traits or increasing virulence (Luong and Kaya 2005). There may be many other aspects of the host- parasite relationship that could be important in parasite virulence and degree of expression of secondary sexual characteristics. For the purpose of this study parasite life cycle and mode of transmission will be further examined using previous empirical

Open Document