Compare And Contrast The Christmas Turkey And The Third Bank Of The River

1685 Words4 Pages

The two Latin American literature I’ll be comparing is “The Christmas Turkey” and “The Third Bank of the River.” In “The Christmas Turkey” it is about a nineteen year old boy and his family attempting to celebrate Christmas but has a tough time due to the father 's death. In the end, the young boy was able to get the family to celebrate Christmas by feasting on the turkey. The other literature “The Third Bank of the River” is about a father who goes on a strange journey with his canoe traveling on the river leaving his family behind. The son would try to interact with his father by providing food on the river bank, but the father would just stay in his canoe all day rowing down the river. The other family member also tries to interact with …show more content…

The narrator tells the stories displaying a connection with his father. In “The Christmas Turkey” the son has conflicts with his father because he blames his father’s death for trying to ruin Christmas. The death of his father causes grief to the entire family making it hard for the family member to move on. This implies that the father has a powerful hold on the family. The son in “The Third Bank of the River” has a stronger connection with his father. Even after his father left him behind, he still tries to connect by providing foods along the banks of the river. He thinks he was the only one that truly understands what the father wants. Also, he felt affection and respect to his father, especially when other people praise him that he look and act more like his father. Over time when the other family member moved away, he was the only one that decided to remain behind. When the son got older, he decided that he would take his father’s place, but fear takes over and he runs away. Nevertheless, he decided when death comes that he wanted to be put into a canoe and travel down the river like his

Open Document