Compare And Contrast Slaughterhouse-Five And How To Tell A True War Story

667 Words2 Pages

Although Vonnegut wrote Slaughterhouse-Five to be science-fictionalized, the nature of the unreliability of the protagonist leads to the reader’s understanding that a true war story isn’t necessarily one that is always factual. This, as well as a lack of a clear moral and the contradictory aspects of the novel, coincides with Tim O’Brien’s indicators for a true war story, as one is described in “How to Tell a True War Story”. These two works of literature are very different and were published around 30 years apart, which proves that war is an idea that is communicated through very different means.

Billy Pilgrim’s PTSD establishes him as a protagonist that can not necessarily be trusted to relay all events of the book. Halfway through his …show more content…

He found that his self-assessment was correct when “The doctors agreed: He was going crazy” (100). From this point on, the reader knows that Billy is mentally ill due to the PTSD from war. The truth is oftentimes blurry for people that have PTSD. According to the National Institute of Health, “psychotic features are frequent in combat veterans with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder” (NIH). Though Billy was not technically a combat veteran because he was a chaplain’s assistant, his role in the war was severely traumatic. For this reason, Billy’s experiences and perspective throughout the novel, Which are based on Kurt Vonnegut’s own experiences in war, can be assumed to have a blurry line between fact and science fiction. Despite this, and because of this, the novel can still be classified as …show more content…

This idea is reflected in Vonnegut’s writing because instead of the traditional method of a chronological book, the story is told through short snippets of the story, all mixed together and loosely connected in order to show the way the veterans cope with the war. It also can be compared to the books that the Tralfamadorians write. When Billy asks about their books, the Tralfamadorians respond that their books are made of “brief, urgent, message[s]- describing a situation, a scene” (88). Furthermore, the Tralfamadorians expand upon the meaning of their books, that “There isn’t any particular relationship between all the messages, except that the author has chosen them carefully, so that, when seen all at once, they produce an image of life that is beautiful and surprising and deep. There is no beginning, no middle, no end, no suspense, no moral, no causes, no effects. What we love in our books are the depths of many marvelous moments seen all at one

Open Document