Compare And Contrast Punish And Foucault's

1001 Words3 Pages

“Foucault’s (1975) Discipline and Punish, discuss how surveillance and discipline are necessary; and that regulatory power is used to control and organise societies and nation-state”. A constant surveillance on people, locating threats and enforcing the law to maintain order. I argue that the Hunger Games plot and Foucault’s (1975) Discipline and Punish does show relation as it surveillance and broadcasts the blood bath game nationwide from the Capitol to the whole 12 district. For Capitol the game is looked as a form of entertainment used to make it seem like honouring the sacrifices that were made to have a safe and harmonious place to live. However, for all 12 districts, it is a form punishment to keep the discipline intact and for past rebellious acts reminding the districts Capitol is the one with power. The Hunger Games (Part 1) takes place in Panem, located at North America which has 12 districts and from each district one male and one female is chosen to participate in a death match, the age range of 12 to 18 years old. The victor lives rest of his/her life in no worries of every …show more content…

As Capital is in absolute control, the citizens of the districts no longer resist their power because it provides them with security and resources to live off. They even self-monitor each other to prevent any mishaps from occurring and conflict from arising making sure everyone does what the Capital asks of them. They censor their thoughts and speak carefully to not bring out a controversial topic that can limit their resources or even worse torture and be sentenced to death as a form of punishment. In contrast, while all 12 Districts fear not having any resources, Capital wastes its resources without thinking twice. The rich are fortunate to have a silver spoon on their mouth while the poor work day and night just so they can fill their and families empty stomach embracing humiliation and

Open Document