Compare And Contrast Piaget's Theory Of Play

1732 Words4 Pages

Theorists help us to learn about play and help us progress in relation to approaches and future planning. Vygotsky believed that imaginative play and relationships are important in relation to a child’s learning, and his theory was called the social constructivist theory. He believed that through play a ‘zone of proximal development’ is created, in which a child’s learns at the height of their potential. He argued against Piaget’s theory. Piaget argued that children did not necessarily learn through play but play just showcases and applies what they have already learnt. Piaget’s theory stated that there was two aspects to play – sensory and movement play and imagination, pretend and symbolic play. The McMillian sisters theorised the idea that children would find it extremely difficult to learn, play and develop without good hygiene and good health. Froebel also had strong opinions on the role of play. He believed in the importance of symbolic play, and imaginative play - stating it was one of the best ways for …show more content…

I believe this because I think that often parents might take more interest in Forest Schools and outdoor play as their children are more enthusiastic and encouraging after attending. Parents can often see more risks when their children play outside apposed to inside a classroom, therefore Forest Schools can show parents another side of play which I believe is important. While in placement we took the children on a school trip to a local woodland, they all found it very exciting and they began collecting leaves and pebbles. We reminded the children to stay hydrated as it was a hot day - when the parents came to collect the children, one child asked his father if they could go again and reminded him that if it was a hot day they must make sure they have water. I think that shows how educational and stimulating it can be for a child, just by playing outside in a different

Open Document