Compare And Contrast O Earth Unhappy Planet Born To Die By Margaret Atwood

1191 Words3 Pages

My dear grandfather passed away last week and I still clearly remember everything that he did with me only a month ago during Christmas break. He looked healthy and energetic. How could a person like that just gone forever so abruptly? It reminds me that life is fragile and death is inevitable. I am a realist, so I could not help thinking if each human being is destined to die some time, then why were we born? It is also the reason why I really like reading people’s opinions about life and death. Two good examples are Margaret Atwood’s “Happy Endings” and Millay’s “O Earth, unhappy planet born to die”. Both Atwood and Millay use sarcastic tone and allusions to focus on the same theme——questioning the real meaning of life.
“Happy Endings” is …show more content…

As Atwood says “Beginnings are always more fun” (59) at the end of the seven scenarios, she writes a lot about different events that John and Mary do which are really fun to read no matter good or bad those events are and they are the preparation Atwood does for the upcoming endings. Then let’s look at Millay’s beginning. Millay says “who when his destiny was high/ Strode like the sun into the middle sky/ And shone an hour/ And who so bright as he” (4-6) at the beginning. We can tell that this is a strong and young man by looking at words like “Strode” and “into the middle sky” which is also the preparation Millay does for the ending——the sun went down into the sea and it is relatively fun to read compare to the ending. Now, I can see there is a structural connection between the two pieces. Moreover, we can figure out that Atwood and Millay actually talk about the same theme by looking at “you’ll have to face it, the endings are the same however you slice it” (Atwood 59) and “And like the sun went down into the sea, Leaving no spark to be remembered by” (Millay 7-8) these two quotes. Atwood uses “face” this particular word when she has lots of other choices like “admit” and “know”. Wouldn’t they be more appropriate words to use there? The purpose of using “face” is to tell readers that she not only wants us to face the fact——there is only one ending for any …show more content…

By using an appropriate tone, it helps me to feel the emotions that the two authors try to put in their stories, so that I can have a better understanding of them. For example, Atwood says “Then Madge devotes herself to charity work until the end of A. If you like, it can be ‘Madge’, ‘can-cer,’ ‘guilty and confused,’ and ‘bird watching.’” (58) at the end of the sixth scenario which did not make sense to me at all when I first read it, because words like “cancer”, “guilty and confused” and “bird watching” totally have no connections with the scenario. How could I use whatever words I want there as Atwood said? However, after I figure out that the story actually talks about the fate of human life. I realize that Atwood is being sarcastic. Her real intention to use those words there is she does not want them to make sense at all, she might even randomly choose those words to show her impatience and carelessness about what our protagonists do when they are alive, so that we can put our attentions on the ending. Also, Atwood gives a summary of the endings of all seven scenarios which is “John and Mary die. John and Mary die. John and Mary die” (59). Why would she repeat the same words three times? It seems to me that she is really bored by the same ending. Unluckily, she has no ability to rewrite that ending, neither does any of us. On the other side, Millay uses

Open Document