Compare And Contrast Machiavelli And Lao Tzu Government

1379 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare and constrast machiavelli and lao tzu

As society has changed, so have many other things. Such as our government. Over the years we’ve gone from a democracy, republic, communism, autocracy, oligarchy, theocracy and fascism. Lao-Tzu believed in Taoism, while Machiavelli prefered a republic. Which form of government is more accurately correct? The definition of government is; the governing body of a nation, state, or community. To see which of these two types of government is more accurate, we must compare them, to see the major differences. Three major differences between Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli’s belief of government are; war, fortune, and mercy.

One of the first major differences between Machiavelli and Lao Tzu’s belief is war... According to Machiavelli, war should be a profession of a prince. He suggested a prince to think about arms than personal luxuries, and he said being disarmed would make him to be despised, …show more content…

“The purpose of this article is to show that there is a proper distinction between good and evil and lots of thoughts and to analyze the different aspects of his conception of evil. it will be argued that he recognizes two kinds of evils the first kind is that which causes human suffering in the world they are supposedly originated and the assertiveness of the human will the second kind of evil is the human suffering caused by the first kind will be shown that lots of philosophy of tail is deeply concerned with the elimination of these evils from the world one cannot fully appreciate his philosophy without taking into account his concern with evils and underlying the societal satirical motive in the course of this discussion we shall deal with the concept of suffering and human well the question of natural sufferings the distinction between good and evil in the final metaphysical status of evils and philosophy one of these many evils that loves to discusses is the human races choice of

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Lao Tzu And Machiavelli's Views On Government

    1369 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lao-Tzu believes in love and trust for the leader whereas Machiavelli strongly believes in fear from the leader. These views are almost complete opposites when paying attention to basics but the more you pay attention there are some similarities to be found, the main one being that they both believe that if the leader is hated then they government will struggle and possibly even fail. These views are almost complete opposites when paying attention to basics but the more you pay attention there are some similarities to be found, the main one being that they both believe that if the leader is hated then they government will struggle and possibly even fail. Another thing that you would be able to compare is that they both genuinely wanted what was best for their people under rule even though their views were complete opposites. Machiavelli said, “It is much safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking,” written in Machiavelli 's Ironic View of History by Salvatore. As far as their views contrast though, it was a very clear and direct that the way they looked at the government was nothing alike. You have one that believes that the only way to rule is to be loved then on the other had you have someone saying that the best kind of ruler is one that is feared, and that being loved isn 't relevant in this case. Lao-Tzu views this way of the government because he feels that if the people are on his side about things, than always fighting against him. Machiavelli though, is more intense on the idea of decision making and thinks that a ruler has to be ruthless no matter what the case, and is willing to make the best decision even if it isn 't the popular

    Read More

  • Ancient Rome DBQ Essay

    537 Words  | 2 Pages

    A good government forms the basis of a good nation. The Republic is a Roman concept and the U.S. today is a Democratic Republic. Document 1 and 2 summarize all three branches of the Roman government and have a chart comparing both our types of governments,

    Read More

  • The Qualities Of A Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    Machiavelli strongly believes that a prince should be involved in the military and understand all military matters. A prince must always be concentrated on war. Whether his country is at war or not, he must always be prepared. He must continuously be training, mentally and physically, and know the terrain around him. Machiavelli believes that a prince who does not attain these military related qualities will fail as a leader. In addition, during times of war, a successful prince should always question all outcomes of possible battles and prepare himself for the future by studying past wars. Studying the

    Read More

  • Comparing Morality in The Prince, Second Treatise of Government, and Utilitarianism

    2060 Words  | 5 Pages

    Niccolo Machiavelli, John Locke, and John Stuart Mill present three distinct models of government in their works The Prince, Second Treatise of Government, and Utilitarianism. From an examination of these models it is possible to infer their views about human nature and its connection to the purpose of government. A key to comparing these views can be found in an examination of their ideas of morality as an intermediary between government and human nature. Whether this morality must be inferred from their writings or whether it is explicitly mentioned, it differs among the three in its definition, source, and purpose.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Han China And Imperial Rome

    477 Words  | 1 Pages

    Imperial Rome and Han China were significant classical empires which have influenced history. Although Imperial Rome and Han China shared centralized governments, infrastructure, and military control of large governments, they differed in their particular methods and values that supported the development of their empires.

    Read More

  • Government: Monarchy, Theocracy, And Republic

    394 Words  | 1 Pages

    In history, governments have endeavored to rule their subjects. Major forms of authority consist primarily of monarchy, absolute monarchy, oligarchy, democracy, tyranny, theocracy, and republic. By examining the main faults of each government, the republic is clearly the superior form.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli vs. Lao-Tzu

    284 Words  | 1 Pages

    Perhaps the most distinct differences between Machiavelli's and Lao-Tzu's are their beliefs in how a government should be run. Whereas Machiavelli writes about the qualities a prince should have while instilling a totalitarian government, Lao-Tzu strongly believes that one cannot have total control, so everything should run its course.

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Compare And Contrast The Prince By Machiavelli

    505 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his book, Machiavelli stated that a true prince must always think of war and that being a military leader is a must. He describes how even when at peace the idea of war must still be on his mind. Stalin demonstrated that he had militial enthusiasm by being the second country in the world to establish a nuclear weapon. Joseph Stalin also never remained neutral regarding two conflicting states. Machiavelli believed very strongly that choosing a side is much more useful when two neighboring countries are at war. An example of Stalin portraying this while ruling is when Poland, Britain, and France were at war against Germany, Italy, and Japan. Stalin chose Britain and France and fought with them in WWII against Germany and their Nazis. These two things helped Stalin to become a powerful military leader and to have a strong support system with his

    Read More

  • The Purpose Of Government In Machiavelli's The Prince

    1192 Words  | 3 Pages

    Is the purpose of government today, similar to that of philosophers of the past, or has there been a shift in political thought? This essay will argue that according to Machiavelli’s The Prince, the purpose of government is to ensure the stability of the state as well as the preservation of the established ruler’s control, and that the best form of government should take the form of an oligarchy. In contrast, in his book, Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes argues that the purpose of government should be to preserve the peace and security of men and, that the best form of government would be an absolute monarchy which would sanction such conditions. This essay will utilize themes of glory, material advantage, peace and stability to illustrate

    Read More

  • John Gardner´s Grendel: An Epic Struggle Between Good and Evil

    806 Words  | 2 Pages

    Through the analysis of characters and their actions, the novel Grendel suggests society has adopted good and evil’s unequal relationship for meaningfulness in life. The modern society is built on the opposite forces of nature and that evil must be challenged although good prevails it. However, evil and good is subjective which makes the true struggle between good and evil. Moreover, our every day actions are differentiated between good and evil acts. Unfortunately, while this occurs, good and evil will never be a black and white concept.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Mao And Hannibal Zedong

    222 Words  | 1 Pages

    Hannibal and Mao Zedong are both legendary travelers They travel on the very long distance and facing with many obstracle without any technology that's why their journey are noteworthy. Both Hannibal and Mao are travel with difference way so they will meet difference experience too and we will going to campare and contrast it point by point. First is time spent for Hannibal he using about 16 years for his marching from Spain to North Africa but Mao using only 370 days marching from South Chaina to North Chaina it's show that Hanniba's journal may be more difficult than Mao's journey. The next thing we will focus is spent resource. Hanibal watse about 54,000 army cause by fighting and winter storms but Mao lost about 56,000 men with guns and

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast John Locke And Machiavelli

    1447 Words  | 3 Pages

    Machiavelli believed that, ethics and morality were considered in other categories than those generally known. He does not deny the existence of, but did not see how they can be useful in its traditional sense as in politics and in the government of the people. According to Machiavelli, a man is by nature a political angry and fearful. Machiavelli had no high opinion of the people. It is assumed that a person is forced to be good and can get into the number of positive features, such as prudence and courage. The prince can only proceed gently and with love, because that would undermine the naivety of his rule, and hence and the well-being of the state. He thought that, the Lord must act morally as far as possible, immorally to the extent to

    Read More

  • Comparing Machiavelli's The Prince and Plato's The Republic

    1784 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many people in history have written about ideal rulers and states and how to maintain them.  Perhaps the most talked about and compared are Machiavelli's, The Prince and Plato's, The Republic.  Machiavelli lived at a time when Italy was suffering from its political destruction.  The Prince, was written to describe the ways by which a leader may gain and maintain power. In Plato?s The Republic, he unravels the definition of justice.  Plato believed that a ruler could not be wholly just unless one was in a society that was also just. His state and ruler was made up to better understand the meaning of justice.  It was not intended to be practiced like that of Machiavelli's. Machiavelli, acknowledging this, explains that it is his intention to write something that is true and real and useful to whoever might read it and not something imaginary,"?for many have pictured republics and principalities which in fact have never been known or seen?(Machiavelli 375)."  Therefore, because one ruler is realistic and the other imaginary, the characteristics of Machiavelli's ruler versus Plato's ruler are distinctly different.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Plato And Machiavelli

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    Notwithstanding the two philosophers’ different views on abstract concepts, Machiavelli’s virtù to fortuna is comparable to Plato’s Justice to Good. Each philosopher grants his ruler with a specific trait that deviates from the leader’s acquired knowledge of abstract concepts. Under their beliefs, the best ruler is the one who conforms to this virtuous trait--for Plato, Justice (Plato 519b-c), and for Machiavelli, virtù (Machiavelli, Prince 29). These traits then extend to a multitude of characteristics that define the careful instruction both philosophers laid out and that will allow the leader to directly change society into a worthy political

    Read More

  • Political Science And Philosophy: The Nature Of Human Nature

    1664 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato, Aristotle and Machiavelli have spent their lives in assertion of which form of government is good and who should be ruler, what type of ...

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Machiavelli And Lao Tzu Government

Open Document