Compare And Contrast Jury Of Her Peers And Trifles

469 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Comparing trifles and a jury of her peers

Have you ever read a mystery book? It is very important to notice the different point of views in a story when reading to catch onto the plot. The characters could be avoiding the truth, like missing out pieces, being forgetful, or didn’t get the full story themselves. The short story “A Jury of Her Peers” and the play “Trifles” have the same main idea, but the point of views are portrayed differently. Different ways to determine the point of view include the way the narrator describes actions, the actions of the characters, and the inside thoughts. Firstly, the play has a point of view where the author puts more details into the story. The narrator, in the short story “A Jury of Her Peers”, says “ - and then again they eyes of the two women met -- this time clung together in a look of dawning comprehension, of growing horror.’’. This shows the activity of what is going on physically, but it doesn't tell the dialogue. Comparing the short story versus the play, the differences are, the short story has more details, a point of view of 3rd limited, and the beginning is different. The similarities are trying to hide the fact that she did it, it’s the same story, the characters, and it has the same ending. This story shows …show more content…

Therefore, has a point of view of 3rd objective because the reader doesn't get as much information and intake on what the characters are feeling. Stage directions, “[ The women listen to the men’s footsteps on the stairs, then look about the kitchen]” show that most of the details are shown in a physical way rather than mental. The reader can get a taste of what the characters feel verbally, but not as much about their background as a whole. Also, the plot is not as in depth as it was in the short story. This means that a lot of details could be left out of the story as it was being told. Now the stories are similar, but this version has way less

Show More
Related

  • A Jury Of Her Peers Symbolism Essay

    527 Words  | 2 Pages

    Symbolism is a literary device in which words, phrases or actions allude to something more than their literal meanings. In the short story “A Jury of Her Peers”, a major example of symbolism is the quilt. The quilt is perhaps the biggest example because it can be tied to many other examples of symbolism within the story, and can also be interpreted in different ways.

    Read More

  • A Jury Of Her Peers Compare And Contrast

    452 Words  | 1 Pages

    The film A Jury of her Peers, is similar to the play, Trifles because it highlights similar points that are referenced in the text and is clear it was used as a basis for the foundation of the film. The names of Mr. and Mrs. Wright are changed to Mr. and Mrs. Burke. The use of facts to outline the climax, are the same as used in the play. Such as the building of suspense of the discovering of the bird and its strangulation and whether Mrs. Burke or Mr. Burke is to place blame. However, as an adaptation, opinions are added into the original framework of the play to add a touch of personalization. The film interprets the drama as a murder mystery, as the attorney and the sheriff search the household to find evidence to place blame on Mrs. Burke. A jury of her Peers, works to portray the emotions of Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, as they discover items that would, (if found by the men) possibly prove her guilty (Bourne, 2013).

    Read More

  • the curious incident of the dog in the night-time

    755 Words  | 2 Pages

    Point of view can greatly affect the way a reader feel about a novel. Point of view affects how the characters are perceived and how well the readers know them. It also provides a means for readers to feel connected with characters, or to better understand what a character is going through. The author’s way of thinking also has a very large impact on the point of view based on how they themselves see a situation. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time is narrated in a very diverse way, by being narrated by a boy with a disorder, it could be very different if told by a different character, and it would change drastically if narrated by someone without autism.

    Read More

  • Point Of View In Love Medicine By Louise Erdrich

    1982 Words  | 4 Pages

    Point of view is one of the single greatest assets an author can use. It helps to move the plot along and show what is happening from a character’s perspective. An author can make the plot more complex by introducing several characters that the reader has to view events through. The events can then be seen through different eyes and mindsets forcing the reader to view the character in a different light. From one perspective a character can seem cruel, yet, from another, the same character can seem like a hero. These vastly contrasting views can be influenced based on the point of view, a character’s background, and the emotions towards them. The novel Love Medicine by Louise Erdrich showcases some examples of events seen from different points

    Read More

  • Susan Glaspell's Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    Susan Glaspell Trifles Susan Glaspell wrote many literary pieces in the early 1900s. Two, in particular, are very similar in theme, which is the play Trifles and the short story “A Jury of Her Peers”. The Trifles was written in 1920 and “A Jury of Her Peers” was written in 1921, a short story, adapted from the play. Susan Glaspell was born in Davenport, IA July 1, 1876 as a middle child and the only daughter. In college, she wrote for her school paper, The Drake, and after Glaspell graduated, she started working for the Des Moines News.

    Read More

  • Compare and Contrast of “Journey to The West” and “Tartuffe”

    857 Words  | 2 Pages

    different time of period and different region, but yet both stories shared similar endings and morals which receive enlightenment first hand. But they had different ways of delivery. their messages, and also their intention of writing their stories. Both stories concluded on powerfully emotional, although with different notes. Wu Cheng'en used third person view to give a general idea of each situation in the story, and yet Moliere used prosody techniques to control the words so that the sound of the play complements its expression of emotions and ideas.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Trifles And A Jury Of Her Peers

    763 Words  | 2 Pages

    The stories Trifles and “A Jury of Her Peers” are both written by Susan Glaspell. The main event in both Trifles and “A Jury of Her Peers” is a murder in the kitchen. Both stories cover the murder of Mrs.Wright’s husband. But, while both Trifles and “A Jury of Her Peers” are about the same story, and the characters are the same, the points of view differ in the two texts.

    Read More

  • A Jury Of Her Peers And Trifles Comparison

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    Susan Glaspell was an American playwright, novelist, journalist, and actress. She married in 1903 to a novelist, poet, and playwright George Cram Cook. In 1915 with other actors, writers, and artists they founded Provincetown Players a group that had six seasons in New York City between 1916-1923. She is known to have composed nine novels, fifteen plays, over fifty short stories, and one biography. She was a pioneering feminist writer and America’s first import and modern female playwright. She wrote the one act play “Trifles” for the Provincetown Players was later adapted into the short shorty “A Jury of Her Peers” in 1917. A comparison in Susan Glaspell’s “Trifles” and “A Jury of Her Peers” changes the titles, unfinished worked, and

    Read More

  • A Jury Of Her Peers Rhetorical Analysis

    1411 Words  | 3 Pages

    A story of murder, fear, and the temptation of betrayal is one that easily snatches up the attention of audiences. In “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, the author uses her southern female characters to emphasize the direct relationship between friendship and connection. Her plot circles around the disastrous discovery of their fellow housewife’s marital murder, and the events that unfolded causing their ultimate decision in prosecuting or shielding her from the men in the story. The author implements revealing dialogue with subtle detailing and glaring symbolism to display the coveted friendships among women above other relationships and that the paths they take to secure them stem from inveterate personal connections.

    Read More

  • Hawthorne's Young Goodman Brown versus Oates' Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been

    1590 Words  | 4 Pages

    Having each story been written in a third-person narrative form, the reader knows the innermost feelings of the protagonists and watches the main characters change. The reader learns what Brown feels as he thinks to himself, “What a wretch I am to leave her on such an errand!” In “Where Are You Going,” the narrator supplies much of Connie’s feelings, such as in the first paragraph, “she knew she was pretty and that was everything.” However, in Young Goodman Brown, “point of view swings subtly between the narrator and the title character. As a result, readers are privy to Goodman Brown’s deepest, darkest thoughts, while also sharing an objective view of his behavior” (Themes and Construction: Young 2). Point of view of “Young Goodman Brown” contrasts with that of “Where Are You Going” because “This narrative voice stays closely aligned to Connie’s point of view” (Themes and Construction: Where 2). Despite the subtle contrast, both points of view allow the reader to see the changes in Brown and Connie; Brown loses his faith and Connie loses herself. Point of view also affects how the reader sees other chara...

    Read More

  • Examining Perspective in Literature

    910 Words  | 2 Pages

    When writing literature, authors will adapt points of view to mold the perceptions of their readers. Three points of view that authors use to draw readers into their works of fiction are the limited perspective, the first-person perspective, and the objective perspective. Three stories will be examined and critiqued for their use of these narrative techniques. Of the three perspectives that will be examined, the first-person perspective is the most useful for sharing the authors’ vision.

    Read More

  • A Jury Of Her Peers Play Analysis

    1540 Words  | 4 Pages

    In any writing the author must go through a specific thought process. This would be especially so if they were revising a previously written work and can be seen when comparing the two. The specific works that will be discussed here are the play, Trifles, and the story, “A Jury of Her Peers”, which were both written by Susan Glaspell and explores the suppression of women in a male dominated world and was based on a real-life murder trial of an Iowa woman that the author had reported. Trifles, a one-act play, was written in 1916. As the play opens, it is a frigid winter day and the characters are in the kitchen of the home, which is the crime scene and the main location of the play, of both the victim and the suspect.

    Read More

  • Cry The Beloved Chapter Nine

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    The objective point of view occurs when the narrator disappears into the background of the story. They work as the reader’s eyes by simply dictating what occurs before them with a lack of adjectives and opinion. The use of this allows the reader to make their own inferences in order to form

    Read More

  • Gender Differences in Susan Glaspell's Trifles

    1046 Words  | 3 Pages

    Susan Glaspell's play, "Trifles", attempts to define one of the main behavioral differences between man and woman. For most of the story, the two genders are not only geographically separated, but also separated in thought processes and motive, so that the reader might readily make comparisons between the two genders. Glaspell not only verbally acknowledges this behavioral difference in the play, but also demonstrates it through the characters' actions and the turns of the plot. The timid and overlooked women who appear in the beginning of the play eventually become the delicate detectives who, discounted by the men, discover all of the clues that display a female to be the disillusioned murderer of her (not so dearly) departed husband. Meanwhile, the men in the play not only arrogantly overlook the "trifling" clues that the women find that point to the murderer, but also underestimate the murderer herself. "These were trifles to the men but in reality they told the story and only the women could see that (Erin Williams)". The women seem to be the insightful unsung heroes while the men remain outwardly in charge, but sadly ignorant.

    Read More

  • Theme Of Everything That Rises Must Converge

    1137 Words  | 3 Pages

    Breaking down point of view in stories can be helpful in determining the central idea, as the two concepts typically support one another. An author such as O’Connor has the ability when writing narrative to use whichever point of view they feel best portrays the story they are telling in the way they would like readers to understand it. By including and excluding certain bits of information, the author can present the story the way they choose, with the option to leave as many or as few subtle or obvious details within the narration as they would like to reveal to

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Jury Of Her Peers And Trifles

Open Document