Compare And Contrast Hoover And Fdr

1036 Words3 Pages

The Great Depression wreaked havoc on the economy, and in light of this President Hoover and President Franklin D Roosevelt Both initiated programs and policies to counter act the effects, however both had very different approaches with varying degree of efficacy. Through their actions, the American people would generally perceive both men quite differently, and cultivated fear in direct respect to both men's approach--both men would earn their critics as the long term effects played out. Hoover and FDR had fairly opposite approaches to solving this horrid depression. As the market begone to plummet, people lost all hope and trust in the economy, which then lead to hysteria. Before all this, however, Hoover and his administration would take a stance of denial. In fact, they believed everything would work its way out and that in the end it would weed out the flaws of Capitalism 3. After denial was no longer an option, Hoover implemented a few bills in order to restore faith. Their is one bill in particular that Hoover would take credit for that would twist the knife further into the wound and plummet the economy even deeper, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 1. The intent behind this tariff was to protect American assets, but was strongly discouraged by hundreds of economist, however Hoover continued forward none the …show more content…

As a result, the Federal Government had/has never been more powerful, and we are more socialistic today than ever. One of the most potent changes that came was the Social Security Act of 1935, and still lives today . 10 Essentially many of today current welfare programs would either sprout from the new deal or as inspiration later on. It may not have ended the depression directly, however it did indeed secure a safer life for everyone who would come after. Perhaps these policies can be credited to stopping our great recession from turning into another

Open Document