Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Filmmaking process
Filmmaking process
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As humans, we make up stories to entertain ourselves. For hundreds of years these stories were written down in books, but with the advent of new technologies, these stories can now be expressed with film. Books and films both tell a story, but a movie can express the story in a very different way. With camera movements, lighting, and score, filmmakers have a wider range of tools to use than authors. When a book is made into a film, it keeps some elements from the original and undergoes changes, in addition to being expressed further with film techniques. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (the book) and The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (the movie), since one is based on the other, The movie is bound to keep some elements from the original. For example, there are excerpts from …show more content…
In the movie, the second act was completely different than the book’s. In the book, the main characters arrive directly at the planet of Magrathea. In the movie, however, they accidentally arrive on the planet Viltvodle VI, and come to face Zaphod’s defeated adversary in the Galactic Election. Trillian is mistaken for having kidnapped the president, is captured, and is taken to Vogshpere, where she is then rescued by the rest of the main characters. Another difference is that in the movie, the romantic relationship between Arthur and Trillian is much more explored than in the book. In the book, Arthur and Trillian meet at a party but Zaphod takes her away, causing Arthur to have some slightly harsh feelings towards Zaphod at the beginning but doesn’t show an interest in Trillian anymore after that. In the movie, Arthur and Trillian have the same backstory, but their feelings towards each other grow over the course of the film and climax at the end when they admit their love for each other and kiss. While a film based off a book usually maintains most of the key components, other details can vary
Many novels are transcribed from their original texts to films. Some of the movies are similar to the original plots, others do not follow the authors work. Alice Hoffman’s novel Practical Magic is altered when it is made into a movie; and Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible which was also made into a movie, was extremely similar to his original writing. There are multiple variables that account for how a movie is made some of them include; the amount of income, how much can be changed, and the author’s approval. The two recreations previously mentioned, have two completely different outcomes, the results all depend on the amount of creative licensing the movie company has.
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie and saw many differences? Well you can also find lots of similarities. In the book “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and the movie “Tom and Huck” there are many similarities and differences having to do with the characters personalities, the setting, the characters relationships with one another and the events that take place.
The differences in the movie and the book might have been intentional. If audiences were to read the book, watch the movie, and reach conclusions, I think they would have great understanding of what’s inside them both. For example, a scene in the movie in which Atticus tells his children why it is a sin to kill a mockingbird was not in the book; from that scene, I inferred on how that became the initial title of the book. By using both resources, I was able to gather information and grasp its contents tighter.
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
When novels are adapted for the cinema, directors and writers frequently make changes in the plot, setting, characterization and themes of the novel. Sometimes the changes are made in adaptations due to the distinctive interpretations of the novel, which involve personal views of the book and choices of elements to retain, reproduce, change or leave out. On the contrary, a film is not just an illustrated version of the novel; it is a totally different medium. When adapting the novel, the director has to leave out a number of things for the simple reason of time difference. Furthermore, other structures and techniques must be added to the film to enhance the beauty and impressions of it. Like a translator, the director wants to do some sort of fidelity to the original work and also create a new work of art in a different medium. Regardless of the differences in the two media, they also share a number of elements: they each tell stories about characters.
Why do directors choose to stay faithful to or depart from a text when they are producing a film? Many directors choose to either alter or maintain literary elements such as characters, plot, and resolution from a text. The presence or lack of these specific features affects the audience. For instance, in the story “The Monkey’s Paw”, a classic short horror story written by W.W. Jacobs, and its accompanying film, the similarities and differences in the characters, plot, and resolution have an effect on the readers and viewers.
For fans of any novel, it is disappointing to find out its film adaption is sometimes nothing at all like the book. In Douglas Adams’ 1979 novel, A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, he writes and portrays a multitude of hilarious situations as well as characters. John Singleton directs A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy movie version in 2005. Most people realize directors take creative liberty in relation to a novel and do not always produce the movie exactly like how readers imagine it, which in turn affects people’s perceptions of the movie. A few main differences between Douglas Adams’ A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy novel and John Singleton’s film version are Arthur’s character development, the team’s relationship with the Vogons, and
Whenever books are adapted for film, changes inevitably have to be made. The medium of film offers several advantages and disadvantages over the book: it is not as adept at exploring the inner workings of people - it cannot explore their minds so easily; however, the added visual and audio capabilities of film open whole new areas of the imagination which, in the hands of a competent writer-director, can more than compensate.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
The books, A Wrinkle in Time and And Then There Were None, both have many differences in the movie versions. The directors of both movies change the plot to make the movie see fit to what they may have imaged the book to be, while still keeping the story line the same.
The super short version of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is, well, weird stuff happens to Arthur Dent, regular Earth-person. But the real joy of this book is in the weird stuff; and there's so much of it that we can't even capture it all.
When you get to the beginning, middle, or end u realize they are both very different. The movie and book have a lot in common like they both have the same characters .
Hollywood is a staple in American culture. After all, The glitz and Glamour of the movie industry are almost majestic in a way, and therefore it is inevitable that a country would become engulfed in the charms of modern cinema. While there are many original ideas in the movie business some producers, with a combination of books and their own creative liberties, have created some of the biggest blockbusters ever seen on the silver screen. However, The contrast between books and movies are to say the least, less than vague. A great example of this book to screen disparity is Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.