Compare And Contrast Essay On The Crucible

732 Words2 Pages

In the movie adaptation of the Crucible by Arthur Miller, Nicholas Hytner takes a play about a town filled with hysteria and superstition and makes it overly dramatic and lacking humane nature. By taking on the task of turning this profound play into a movie, the credibility of why the people of Salem would believe in the evils of witchcraft must be present. The element of hysteria arrives too quickly and only exists within a select group of people: the afflicted and their loved ones. It is also difficult to understand how the people of Salem could believe in witchcraft when Abigail William’s group of girls are obviously pretending to see spirits and feint to the ground because of the Devil’s acquaintances. Overall, this play is poorly adapted …show more content…

In the play, John Proctor is an honorable man who cannot forgive himself for committing lechery with Abigail. Everytime he interacts with her he is full of regret and very distant. But in the movie, Proctor and Abigail kiss in one of the scenes, and although John eventually pushes away, the moment still twists his honor and the viewer’s perspective of him. Arthur Miller needed Proctor to be a man who cannot forgive himself for breaking one of the ten commandments, not one that indulges in actions he should not. The reason he is depicted as he is in the play is so that in the end there is a strong notion that everything he does is to keep his name intact and to better his reputation. But, the kiss makes John Proctor seem like an indulgent sinner and lessens the credibility that he is a good man who made a mistake and cannot forgive himself. Although John’s death is very sad, this disconnect in the adaptation of the play lessens the viewer’s emotional connection to this tragic …show more content…

He is seen as an intellectual who everyone is hoping can solve the problem of witchcraft. But in the movie, specifically the scene where he is looking for signs of the Devil on Ruth Putnam, the angle of the camera just impacts the scene in a very negative way. Although Hale becomes more strong and influential at the end of the film, the naivety in the beginning causes an essential disconnect with Hale’s true character. His transformation throughout the whole movie, almost as significant as John Proctor’s, is actually one of the most beneficial moments and perfectly shown change. The final reason that this film is not a good adaptation of the play is that the final moment that Elizabeth and John Proctor share is more awkward than it is full of emotions. In the novel, there just are not enough words to say which leads to their silence, and that is made obvious. But in the movie, the silence is awkward and lacking purpose. The scenic aspects are beautiful as the emotions run high and the tears fall quickly as they stand in the strong winds. Yet their final goodbye takes away from the quality and significance of their love for each other. Small scenes and characteristics like these are what Arthur Miller places importance on, thus without them the movie is being poorly

Open Document