Compare And Contrast Deontology Vs Utilitarianism

398 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: The case of utilitarianism

Utilitarianism vs. Deontology Introduction: Throughout this essay I will compare the ethical theory of utilitarianism with that of deontology. I will provide an argument that deontology is a more appropriate ethical theory than utilitarianism. Body: A discussion of the main elements of Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism judges actions on the basis of how much utility or benefit is derived, for the welfare of the majority, through undertaking these actions. It suggests that no act is necessarily right or wrong but the degree of correctness in the act depends on the utility gained by the majority. One of the defects of utilitarianism is that it justifies immoral acts as being deemed necessary if it prohibits future detriment for the majority. An

Show More
Related

  • Deontological Moral Theory

    1228 Words  | 3 Pages

    Also, since deontologists place a high value on the individual, in some instances it is permissible not to maximize the good when it is detrimental to yourself. For example, one does not need to impoverish oneself to the point of worthlessness simply to satisfy one’s moral obligations. Deontology can be looked at as a generally flexible moral theory that allows for self-interpretation but like all others theories studied thus far, there are arguments one can make against its reasoning. One objection to deontological moral theory is that the theory yields only absolutes and cannot always justify its standpoints.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ethical Egoism And Utilitarianism

    1135 Words  | 3 Pages

    Philosophy has been a field of study for centuries. Some philosophers have developed ways to determine what is ethical and what is not. This has led to several normative ethical theories describing how people are ought to live a moral life. Some of the most prominent of these theories have set the criteria for morality in very unique and peculiar ways. Two of which are the ethical egoistic theory and the utilitarian theory, each seeing morality in its own distinctive way. By comparing and contrasting the view these theories pose on morality and by analyze how each stands in some of the world’s most modern day issues, one can understand why utilitarianism is a

    Read More

  • Bernard Williams and Utilitarianism

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    The utilitarian faces many problems because he loses any ability to live a personal life. By this is meant that in making decisions the utilitarian must consider the steps which lead to the highest level of goodness in society. The utilitarian reaches for the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Two main aspects dominate the light of utilitarian beliefs. The consequentialist principle explains that in determining the rightness or wrongness of an act one must examine the results that will follow. The utility principle is that you can only deem something to be good if it in itself will bring upon a specific desired state, such as happiness or fulfillment. There are two types of utilitarians: Act utilitarians and Rule utilitarians. An act utilitarian believes that a person must think things through before making a decision. The only exception to this idea applies with rules of thumb; decisions that need to be made spontaneously. The right act is the one that results in the most utility. Rule utilitarians believe that an act is only deemed appropriate if it fits in line with the outline of valid rules within a system of rules that target the most favorable outcome.

    Read More

  • Mill's Utilitarianism

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    The main principle of utilitarianism is the greatest happiness principle. It states that, "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure" (Mill, 1863, Ch. 2, p330). In other words, it results with the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people that are involved.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast A Theory Of Justice By John Rawls

    1366 Words  | 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism states that the right actions are the ones that create the most happiness for the greatest number of people (Mill, 1871 Pg. 1072). Utilitarianism posits that actions are right because, and to the extent that; they result in good (Mill, 1871 Pg. 1072). Therefore, the right action for a utilitarian is the one that does the most good, where the most good is happiness. A utilitarian holds happiness as the highest intrinsic value, and happiness is intended to mean pleasure (Mill, 1871 Pg. 1072). An action is wrong because it promotes pain, the opposite of happiness or pl...

    Read More

  • Deontological Vs. Teleological Ethical Systems

    1138 Words  | 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism is the view that "what is good is determined by the consequences of the action". If it can be shown that an action benefits the greater amount, then it is good because it outweighs the small amount of harm that the action has caused (Pollock, 2004).... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Why Torture is Morally Wrong

    2139 Words  | 5 Pages

    Pojman, L. (2002). 6: Utilitarianism. Ethics: discovering right and wrong (pp. 104-113). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Utilitarianism

    1582 Words  | 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a moral theory that approaches moral questions of right and wrong by considering the actual consequences of a variety of possible actions. These consequences are generally those that either positively or negatively affect other living beings. If there are both good and bad actual consequences of a particular action, the moral individual must weigh the good against the bad and go with the action that will produce the most good for the most amount of people. If the individual finds that there are only bad consequences, then she must go with the behavior that causes the least amount of bad consequences to the least amount of people. There are many different methods for calculating the utility of each moral decision and coming up with the best

    Read More

  • Qualitative Hedonism and Happiness

    1199 Words  | 3 Pages

    The. “What Utilitarianism Is”: Chapter 2.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism: Consequential Moral Theory

    1008 Words  | 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism often flies in the face of our typical intuitions. Where we generally judge an action to be moral or not in itself, utilitarianism is a consequential moral theory. An action is not inherently good or evil on its own. What makes an action morally good or morally wrong is the consequences is produces. According to John Stuart Mill, “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.”

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Utilitarianism

    1219 Words  | 3 Pages

    The claim that “utilitarianism entails manifold injustice, disintegrated lives, and decisions that are not decisions at all” is a fair assessment. These three objections to utilitarianism are difficult to overcome. One of the issues with utilitarianism as a theory is that it creates manifold injustice. In terms of justice toward others, the theory requires the sacrifice of the minority interests, and perhaps their rights as well, to those of the majority. This usage of

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of Utilitarianism

    1286 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are numerous views and opinions regarding the field of philosophy, in particularly the different ethical theories. I am going to explain the main idea as well as discuss the differences between the utilitarianism, the deontological, and the virtue-ethical theories of morality by presenting what I find to be the strengths and weaknesses of each theory.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism In The Workplace Essay

    539 Words  | 2 Pages

    The utilitarianism is a conceptual framework which claims that the end and consequences justify the means. On the contrary, deontology is a theory which strongly ignores the end as a tool of justifying the means. Deontology is an ethical system which utilizes the moral code to deliver judgment on the right or wrong behind a specific action while neglecting the consequences. According to Immanuel Kant, the theory means following the proper behavioral rules with a close focus on equality and fairness promotion. Consider the case where the government identifies your land as a potential and tremendous location of a city park.

    Read More

  • The Three Classical Ethical Theories

    1435 Words  | 3 Pages

    A natural way to see whether an act is the right thing to do (or the wrong thing to do) is to look at its results, or consequences. Utilitarianism argues that, given a set of choices, the act we should choose is that which produces the best results for the greatest number affected by that choice.

    Read More

  • Differences Between Utilitarianism And Hedonism

    1628 Words  | 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is defined to be “the view that right actions are those that result in the most beneficial balance of good over bad consequences for everyone involved” (Vaughn 64). In other words, for a utilitarian,

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Deontology Vs Utilitarianism

Open Document